To date, no instruments exist to quantify the psychosocial consequences of voice disorders. The aim of the present investigation was the development of a statistically robust Voice Handicap Index (VHI). An 85-item version of this instrument was administered to 65 consecutive patients seen in the Voice Clinic at Henry Ford Hospital. The data were subjected to measures of internal consistency reliability and the initial 85-item version was reduced to a 30-item final version. This final version was administered to 63 consecutive patients on two occasions in an attempt to assess test-retest stability, which proved to be strong. The findings of the latter analysis demonstrated that a change between two administrations of 18 points represents a significant shift in psychosocial function.
Quality-of-life indicators for dysphagia provide invaluable information to the treating clinician regarding the success or failure of swallowing therapy. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinically efficient, statistically robust patient-reported outcomes tool that measures the handicapping effect of dysphagia on emotional, functional, and physical aspects of individual's lives. 60 statements describing the handicapping effect of dysphagia were collected from patient reports and divided into subscales of physical, emotional, and functional problems. The statements were presented to 77 individuals with dysphagia. Respondents replied never, sometimes, or always to each statement and rated their self-perceived dysphagia severity on a 7-point equal-appearing interval scale. Cronbach's α was performed to assess the internal consistency validation of the items within the questionnaire. The final questionnaire was reduced to 25 items and administered to 214 individuals with dysphagia and 74 controls. Test-retest was performed on 63 individuals with dysphagia. Cronbach's α for the initial and final versions was strong at r = 0.96 and r = 0.94, respectively. Significant differences occurred between the dysphagia and control groups. Test-retest reliability was strong. We present a new, easy-to-complete, statistically robust, patient-reported outcomes measure for assessing the handicapping effect of dysphagia.
Evaluation of 63 patients undergoing primary radiation therapy for treatment of T1 and T2 glottic carcinomas was undertaken to evaluate the success of primary treatment and to identify factors which might influence recurrence or voice quality. Twelve patients (19%) recurred following radiation therapy, with ultimate salvage in 11, for a 3-year survival rate of 98%. Voice preservation was achieved in 83%. Continued smoking after radiation therapy was associated with significantly greater risk of recurrence. Stage of tumor and anterior commissure involvement were not associated with increased recurrences. Sixty-seven percent of patients who did not recur had good voice quality after treatment. Vocal fold stripping or excisional biopsy rather than limited biopsy for initial diagnosis, complications of treatment, and continued smoking after treatment were all significantly associated with an increased risk of poorer voice quality after treatment while bilateral vocal fold tumors were associated with risks that approached significance. Voice analysis of five patients revealed that objective changes in voice can be detected after radiation therapy in those with associated risk factors but may be normal in those without these risk factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.