While low levels of unesterified long chain fatty acids (LCFAs) are normal metabolic intermediates of dietary and endogenous fat, LCFAs are also potent regulators of key receptors/enzymes, and at high levels become toxic detergents within the cell. Elevated levels of LCFAs are associated with diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Consequently, mammals evolved fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) that bind/sequester these potentially toxic free fatty acids in the cytosol and present them for rapid removal in oxidative (mitochondria, peroxisomes) or storage (endoplasmic reticulum, lipid droplets) organelles. Mammals have a large (15 member) family of FABPs with multiple members occurring within a single cell type. The first described FABP, liver-FABP (L-FABP, or FABP1), is expressed in very high levels (2-5% of cytosolic protein) in liver as well as intestine and kidney. Since L-FABP facilitates uptake and metabolism of LCFAs in vitro and in cultured cells, it was expected that abnormal function or loss of L-FABP would reduce hepatic LCFA uptake/ oxidation and thereby increase LCFAs available for oxidation in muscle and/or storage in adipose. This prediction was confirmed in vitro with isolated liver slices and cultured primary hepatocytes from L-FABP gene-ablated mice. Despite unaltered food consumption when fed a control diet ad libitum, the L-FABP null mice exhibited age-and sex-dependent weight gain and increased fat tissue mass. The obese phenotype was exacerbated in L-FABP null mice pair-fed a high fat diet. Taken together with other findings, these data suggest that L-FABP could have an important role in preventing age-or diet-induced obesity.
Abnormal energy regulation may significantly contribute to the pathogenesis of obesity, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. For rapid control of energy homeostasis, allosteric and posttranslational events activate or alter activity of key metabolic enzymes. For longer impact, transcriptional regulation is more effective, especially in response to nutrients such as long chain fatty acids (LCFA). Recent advances provide insights into how poorly water-soluble lipid nutrients [LCFA; retinoic acid (RA)] and their metabolites (long chain fatty acyl Coenzyme A, LCFA-CoA) reach nuclei, bind their cognate ligand-activated receptors, and regulate transcription for signaling lipid and glucose catabolism or storage: (i) while serum and cytoplasmic LCFA levels are in the 200 mircroM-mM range, real-time imaging recently revealed that LCFA and LCFA-CoA are also located within nuclei (nM range); (ii) sensitive fluorescence binding assays show that LCFA-activated nuclear receptors [peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha (HNF4alpha)] exhibit high affinity (low nM KdS) for LCFA (PPARalpha) and/or LCFA-CoA (PPARalpha, HNF4alpha)-in the same range as nuclear levels of these ligands; (iii) live and fixed cell immunolabeling and imaging revealed that some cytoplasmic lipid binding proteins [liver fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), acyl CoA binding protein (ACBP), cellular retinoic acid binding protein-2 (CRABP-2)] enter nuclei, bind nuclear receptors (PPARalpha, HNF4alpha, CRABP-2), and activate transcription of genes in fatty acid and glucose metabolism; and (iv) studies with gene ablated mice provided physiological relevance of LCFA and LCFA-CoA binding proteins in nuclear signaling. This led to the hypothesis that cytoplasmic lipid binding proteins transfer and channel lipidic ligands into nuclei for initiating nuclear receptor transcriptional activity to provide new lipid nutrient signaling pathways that affect lipid and glucose catabolism and storage.
Although liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) isan important binding site for various hydrophobic ligands in hepatocytes, its in vivo significance is not understood. We have therefore created L-FABP null mice and report here their initial analysis, focusing on the impact of this mutation on hepatic fatty acid binding capacity, lipid composition, and expression of other lipid-binding proteins. Gel-filtered cytosol from L-FABP null liver lacked the main fatty acid binding peak in the fraction that normally comprises both L-FABP and sterol carrier protein-2 (SCP-2). The binding capacity for cis-parinaric acid was decreased >80% in this region. Molar ratios of cholesterol/cholesterol ester, cholesteryl ester/triglyceride, and cholesterol/phospholipid were 2-to 3-fold greater, reflecting up to 3-fold absolute increases in specific lipid classes in the order cholesterol > cholesterol esters > phospholipids. In contrast, the liver pool sizes of nonesterified fatty acids and triglycerides were not altered. However, hepatic deposition of a bolus of intravenously injected family (1-3), is found in the liver, intestine, and kidney, but only in liver is it not co-expressed with other members of its family. L-FABP is known to bind fatty acids and various other hydrophobic molecules, although its actual contribution to the lipid-binding capacity of liver cytosol is not known. Given that L-FABP is expressed at very high levels (2-5% of cytosolic protein) in the differentiated hepatocyte (4, 5) and that these levels correlate well with lipid metabolism (2), it can be speculated that L-FABP contributes considerably to hepatic lipidbinding and lipid metabolism. Work with cell-free systems and transfected cells has further strengthened this view. For example, in cell-free preparations L-FABP was shown to stimulate the esterification of oleic acid while inhibiting that of palmitic acid (6). L cells overexpressing L-FABP show increased rates of fatty acid uptake and esterification (7) as well as increased contents of phospholipid and cholesterol esters (8, 9). HepG2 hepatoma cells expressing an L-FABP antisense RNA showed a dose-dependent reduction of fatty acid uptake (10). Furthermore, overexpression of L-FABP in McA-RH7777 hepatoma cells incubated with palmitic acid decreased the synthesis and secretion of triglycerides while increasing beta oxidation and the secretion of apolipoprotein B100 (11). Thus, the various in vitro systems have allowed researchers to propose specific functions of L-FABP in vivo.However, in vitro studies of FABPs have inherent limitations. The only firmly established function of FABPs is the reversible binding of hydrophobic ligands, and these proteins do not exhibit any enzymatic function or energy requirement. This suggests that these proteins play passive (facilitative) roles that, almost by definition, are strongly dependent on the cellular context. One context of the highly expressed L-FABP is the highly differentiated hepatocyte, a cell type featuring an intense lipid metabolism that is not eas...
Fluorescent sterols, dehydroergosterol and NBD-cholesterol, were used to examine high density lipoproteinmediated cholesterol uptake and intracellular targeting in L-cell fibroblasts. The uptake, but not esterification or targeting to lipid droplets, of these sterols differed >100-fold, suggesting significant differences in uptake pathways. NBD-cholesterol uptake kinetics and lipoprotein specificity reflected high density lipoprotein-mediated sterol uptake via the scavenger receptor B1. Fluorescence energy transfer showed an average intermolecular distance of 26 Å between the two fluorescent sterols in L-cells. Indirect immunofluorescence revealed that both fluorescent sterols localized to L-cell lipid droplets, the surface of which contained adipose differentiation-related protein. This lipid droplet-specific protein specifically bound NBD-cholesterol with high affinity (K d ؍ 2 nM) at a single site. Thus, NBDcholesterol and dehydroergosterol were useful fluorescent probes of sterol uptake and intracellular sterol targeting. NBD-cholesterol more selectively probed high density lipoprotein-mediated uptake and rapid intracellular targeting of sterol to lipid droplets. Targeting of sterol to lipid droplets was correlated with the presence of adipose differentiation related protein, a lipid droplet-specific protein shown for the first time to bind unesterified sterol with high affinity.Because of cholesterol's dual role in both normal cell function and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis, it is essential to resolve the mechanisms whereby exogenous cholesterol is taken up and distributed within the cell (reviewed in Refs. 1-3). Unesterified cholesterol uptake shares some, but not all, aspects of cholesterol ester uptake. Unesterified cholesterol enters the cell either by the slower LDL 1 receptor mediated pathway wherein it leaves the LDL endocytosed within clathrin-coated vesicles prior to vesicle fusion at the lysosome (for review, see Ref.3) or by the rapid "alternate" HDL receptor pathway (3, 5). However, most attention has focused on the HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux from rather than uptake of cholesterol into the cell (for review, see Ref. 4). Almost nothing is known regarding the uptake and intracellular targeting of unesterified cholesterol via the HDL receptor pathway nor has the process been directly visualized. Fluorescent cholesterol analogs represent an opportunity for real-time monitoring of the rapid, HDL-mediated uptake of unesterified sterol uptake and movement in living cells. The main requirement for choice of an appropriate fluorescent cholesterol analogue is that it should mimic the behavior of cholesterol. Unfortunately, the functional properties of many fluorescent sterol analogues do not closely resemble those of cholesterol (for review, see Refs. 6 -9). The advent of dehydroergosterol (DHE), whose structure closely resembles that of cholesterol, represents a major advance for examining the structure of lipoproteins (10, 11) and membranes (12). DHE is a naturally occurring sterol where it...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.