Adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in breast cancer are increasingly based on the pathologist's assessment of tumor proliferation. The Swiss Working Group of Gyneco- and Breast Pathologists has surveyed inter- and intraobserver consistency of Ki-67-based proliferative fraction in breast carcinomas.MethodsFive pathologists evaluated MIB-1-labeling index (LI) in ten breast carcinomas (G1, G2, G3) by counting and eyeballing. In the same way, 15 pathologists all over Switzerland then assessed MIB-1-LI on three G2 carcinomas, in self-selected or pre-defined areas of the tumors, comparing centrally immunostained slides with slides immunostained in the different laboratoires. To study intra-observer variability, the same tumors were re-examined 4 months later.ResultsThe Kappa values for the first series of ten carcinomas of various degrees of differentiation showed good to very good agreement for MIB-1-LI (Kappa 0.56–0.72). However, we found very high inter-observer variabilities (Kappa 0.04–0.14) in the read-outs of the G2 carcinomas. It was not possible to explain the inconsistencies exclusively by any of the following factors: (i) pathologists' divergent definitions of what counts as a positive nucleus (ii) the mode of assessment (counting vs. eyeballing), (iii) immunostaining technique, and (iv) the selection of the tumor area in which to count. Despite intensive confrontation of all participating pathologists with the problem, inter-observer agreement did not improve when the same slides were re-examined 4 months later (Kappa 0.01–0.04) and intra-observer agreement was likewise poor (Kappa 0.00–0.35).ConclusionAssessment of mid-range Ki-67-LI suffers from high inter- and intra-observer variability. Oncologists should be aware of this caveat when using Ki-67-LI as a basis for treatment decisions in moderately differentiated breast carcinomas.

BackgroundThe gold standard of HER2 status assessment in breast cancer is still debated. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in-situ technology as fluorescent-labeled methodology (FISH) can be influenced by pre-analytical factors, assay-conditions and interpretation of test results. We retrospectively conducted this quality control study and analyzed HER2 test results in breast cancer within the routine diagnostic service in a single institution over a period of 12 years. We addressed the question how stable and concordant IHC and FISH methods are and whether HER2 positivity rate has changed over this period.MethodsData of 7714 consecutive HER2-FISH-assays in a period of 12 years (2001–2012) on breast cancer biopsies and excision specimens were retrospectively analyzed. From 2001 to 2004, FISH tests were performed from all cases with IHC score 3+ and 2+ (and in some tumors with IHC score 1+ and 0). From 2005–2010, HER2 status was only determined by FISH. From 2011–2012, all breast carcinomas were analyzed by both IHC and FISH. Scoring and cut-off-definition were done according to time-current ASCO-CAP and FDA-guidelines.ResultsBetween 2001–2004, IHC score 3+ was diagnosed in 22% of cases, 69% of these 3+ cases were amplified by FISH. 6% of IHC score 0/1+ cases were amplified by FISH. There was a mean amplification rate of 15.8% (range 13 -19%) using FISH only HER2-assays (2005–2010). Starting 2008, a slight drop in the amplification rate from 17% to 14% was noticed due to the modified ASCO-criteria in 2007. From 2011–2012, 12% of cases were 3+ by IHC, 84% of them were amplified by FISH. Less than 1% of IHC score 0/1+ cases were amplified by FISH. Concordance between FISH and IHC increased from 83% to 97%.ConclusionsOur quality control study demonstrates that HER2 positivity rate remained stable by FISH-technology but showed a significant variation by IHC over the analyzed 12 years. Improvement in concordance rate was due to standardization of pre-analytical factors, scoring and interpretation.

Successful treatment of bladder cancer depends largely on early diagnosis of primary and recurrent disease. Sensitive, specific and noninvasive procedures for detection are especially needed for grade 1 and 2 bladder tumors, because of the relatively low sensitivity of cytology. Here we introduce a novel strategy to improve the sensitivity and reliability of microsatellite analyses by employing marker-specific threshold values for loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) at 10 loci. These individual cut-offs were experimentally determined with 35 normal control tissues and subsequently validated in a retrospective study with bladder cancer biopsies from 86 patients. In a prospective analysis of voided urines samples and matched blood probes from 91 patients, LOH-analysis, UroVysion FISH and conventional urine cytology were compared with histological findings of consecutive transurethral biopsies. Whereas all samples could be analyzed by our LOH assay, only 56 samples were suitable for all 3 analyses. The highest sensitivity was obtained with our LOH-assay/cytology approach (G1-2: 72%; G3: 96%) being only surpassed by a combination of all 3 techniques (G1-2: 83%; G3: 100%). Since over 93% of the patients with recurrent disease were identified by LOH/cytology-analyses of their voided urine samples, a monitoring scheme alternating cystoscopy with LOH/cytology-examination could now be envisioned to reduce invasive interventions and consequently improve followup compliance, especially in patients with low grade tumors. ' 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Surgical specimens of 65 adrenal and 27 extra-adrenal paragangliomas, the latter comprising 11 carotid body, five jugulotympanic, one aorticopulmonary, eight aorticosympathetic and two visceral autonomic tumours, were examined immunocytochemically for the presence of glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and S-100 protein. Six adrenal and four extra-adrenal (one parasympathetic and three sympathetic) neoplasms pursued a malignant clinical course. S-100 staining of sustentacular (type 2) cells was seen in both adrenal (48/65) and extra-adrenal (23/27) lesions, the 10 malignant tumours being entirely devoid of S-100 protein positive cells. GFAP positivity of type 2 cells was seen in only 16 of the extra-adrenal tumours, all of these lesions belonging to the group of benign parasympathetic paragangliomas. The presence of S-100 positive type 2 cells may thus help to exclude malignancy in individual paraganglioma cases, while GFAP positivity of such cells renders possible the correct typing of benign parasympathetic paragangliomas.