Background Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence.Methods ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362.

Introduction: Bridging stent-grafts (BSGs) are used to connect the target vessel with the main body during fenestrated or branched aortic endografting (f/bEVAR). At present, no dedicated device is available as BSG and different combinations of stent-grafts and relining stents have been proposed. Aims of this study were to assess the performance of the BSGs and to address potential risk factors for poor outcomes. Methods: Between 01/2010 and 03/2014, 150 consecutive patients underwent f/bEVAR and 515 target vessels were revascularized. Main measure outcome was any BSG-related complication. A logistic regression analysis including target vessel type, type of

The currently used BSGs had low occlusion and re-intervention rates. Modifications of the branched design or dedicated BSG devices may improve outcome, especially after bEVAR.

Purpose Bridging stent stability is crucial for efficacy and safety of branched aortic endovascular repair (bEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). In this study, we assess the performance of the new Viabahn Balloon-Expandable endoprosthesis (VBX) in bEVAR. Based on our learning curve we give recommendations for a safe and effective use of the device. Materials and Methods We prospectively collected the data of patients with TAAAs undergoing bEVAR between December 2017 and December 2019. All patients with implantation of at least 1 VBX stent-graft as bridging stent were included in our single-center analysis. Demographic, comorbidity, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) data of 112 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Primary endpoint was a composite of branch-related technical success and freedom from target vessel instability. Secondary endpoints were clinical and ongoing clinical success. Results Primary endpoint: technical success was achieved in all patients (100%) with a freedom from target vessel instability of 96.3% after a median follow-up of 18 months. Overall mortality was 13.4% (n=15) and 13 patients underwent secondary interventions, 12 of them are still alive and 1 suffered from aneurysm sac expansion, consequently an ongoing clinical success of 75.9% was reached. After modification of the implantation technique during the course of the study by selecting longer stent lengths after accurate estimation of vessel curvature and expected adaptation of the flexible endoskeleton to the specific anatomical conditions, no type Ic endoleaks were observed in the last 70 cases. Conclusions The VBX stent-graft can be safely used as bridging stent for branched thoracoabdominal repair. However, learning curve should be considered to avoid type Ic endoleak and edge stenosis. Based on this experience longer landing zones and 2-step deployment of VBX are useful for successful bridging also of challenging target vessels.

Purpose: Bridging stents undergo millions of cycles during respiratory movements of the kidneys throughout the patient’s life. Thus, understanding the response of fabric and endoskeleton of the stent to cyclic loading over the time is crucial. In this study, we compare the fatigue resistance of the Viabahn Balloon-Expandable stent-graft (VBX) with the widely used Advanta V12/iCast under prolonged stress induction. Materials and Methods: A polyester test sheet with 10 fenestrations was used simulating a fenestrated endograft. Five 6×59 mm VBX stent-grafts and five 6×58 mm Advanta stent-grafts were implanted into 6×6 mm fenestrations. The stents were flared with a 10×20 mm PTA (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) catheter and connected with a fatigue stress machine. All stent-grafts were evaluated by microscopy and radiography at baseline and after regular intervals until 50,000,000 cycles were applied, simulating a life span of approximately 75 months. Freedom from fracture (FF), freedom from initial polytertafluoroethylene (PTFE) changes (FIC), and from PTFE breakpoint (FBP, all-layer defect) were calculated. Results: Digital radiographic images did not show any stent fracture in both groups after 50,000,000 cycles. The VBX stent-graft was free from any all-layer defects at the conclusion of 50,000,00 cycles resulting in a significant higher FBP compared with Advanta V12 (50,000,000 vs 33,400,000; p<0.01). All-layer defects were observed only in the Advanta group. Two of 5 Advanta stents showed early penetration of the nitinol ring causing a defect of PTFE. Regarding FIC, there was no significant difference between the stents (3,400,000 in VBX vs 3,200,000 in Advanta). Conclusions: In fatigue tests simulating respiration movements, VBX and Advanta V12 performed equally well in terms of fracture resistance and freedom from initial PTFE changes. VBX maintained freedom from PTFE breakpoint throughout the full 50,000,000 cycles. All-layers defects were detected only in Advanta and were mainly caused by penetration of the nitinol ring through the PTFE.