U-BIOPRED is a European Union consortium of 20 academic institutions, 11 pharmaceutical companies and six patient organisations with the objective of improving the understanding of asthma disease mechanisms using a systems biology approach.This cross-sectional assessment of adults with severe asthma, mild/moderate asthma and healthy controls from 11 European countries consisted of analyses of patient-reported outcomes, lung function, blood and airway inflammatory measurements.Patients with severe asthma (nonsmokers, n=311; smokers/ex-smokers, n=110) had more symptoms and exacerbations compared to patients with mild/moderate disease (n=88) (2.5 exacerbations versus 0.4 in the preceding 12 months; p<0.001), with worse quality of life, and higher levels of anxiety and depression. They also had a higher incidence of nasal polyps and gastro-oesophageal reflux with lower lung function. Sputum eosinophil count was higher in severe asthma compared to mild/moderate asthma (median count 2.99% versus 1.05%; p=0.004) despite treatment with higher doses of inhaled and/or oral corticosteroids.Consistent with other severe asthma cohorts, U-BIOPRED is characterised by poor symptom control, increased comorbidity and airway inflammation, despite high levels of treatment. It is well suited to identify asthma phenotypes using the array of "omic" datasets that are at the core of this systems medicine approach. @ERSpublications Severe asthma results in more airway inflammation, worse symptoms and lower lung function, despite increased therapy http://ow.ly/QznR3

Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most common causes of adverse drug reactions. Majority of them are of the hypersensitivity type. The two frequent clinical presentations of aspirin hypersensitivity are: aspirin‐induced bronchial asthma/rhinosinusitis (AIA/R) and aspirin‐induced urticaria/angioedema (AIU). The decisive diagnosis is based on provocation tests with aspirin, as the in vitro test does not hold diagnostic value as yet. Detailed protocols of oral, bronchial and nasal aspirin provocation tests are presented. Indications, contraindications for the tests, the rules of drug withdrawal and equipment are reviewed. Patient supervision and interpretations of the tests are proposed.

Indirect challenges act by causing the release of endogenous mediators that cause the airway smooth muscle to contract. This is in contrast to the direct challenges where agonists such as methacholine or histamine cause airflow limitation predominantly via a direct effect on airway smooth muscle.Direct airway challenges have been used widely and are well standardised. They are highly sensitive, but not specific to asthma and can be used to exclude current asthma in a clinic population. Indirect bronchial stimuli, in particular exercise, hyperventilation, hypertonic aerosols, as well as adenosine, may reflect more directly the ongoing airway inflammation and are therefore more specific to identify active asthma. They are increasingly used to evaluate the prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and to assess specific problems in patients with known asthma, e.g. exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, evaluation before scuba diving.Direct bronchial responsiveness is only slowly and to a modest extent, influenced by repeated administration of inhaled steroids. Indirect challenges may reflect more closely acute changes in airway inflammation and a change in responsiveness to an indirect stimulus may be a clinically relevant marker to assess the clinical course of asthma. Moreover, some of the indirect challenges, e.g. hypertonic saline and mannitol, can be combined with the assessment of inflammatory cells by induction of sputum.

In vivo production of thromboxane (TX) A2 and the cysteinyl-containing leukotrienes (LT) C4, D4, and E4 in correlation to airway responses was studied. Bronchial provocation with specific allergen in atopic asthmatics was followed by a significant increase in urinary concentration of immunoreactive LTE4 (34 +/- 6 before versus 56 +/- 7 ng/mmol creatinine after allergen challenge; n = 5) and 11-dehydro-TXB2 (164 +/- 29 versus 238 +/- 25 ng/mmol creatinine). In the presence of the leukotriene-antagonist ICI-204,219, which significantly increased the PD20 for allergen, the increment in urinary excretion of LTE4 was even higher (60 +/- 8 versus 288 +/- 128 ng/mmol creatinine; n = 5). In contrast, provocation with histamine (n = 5) did not provoke release of leukotrienes or thromboxane, nor was inhalation of LTD4 (n = 7) associated with increased urinary concentration of 11-dehydro-TXB2. Furthermore, bronchoconstriction induced by inhalation of lysine-aspirin in aspirin-sensitive asthmatics (n = 4) was followed by increased levels of LTE4 in the urine, whereas the levels of 11-dehydro-TXB2 remained the same. Finally, the basal levels of LTE4 in the urine of nine aspirin-sensitive asthmatics were elevated as compared with 15 other asthmatics (112 +/- 54 versus 38 +/- 20 ng/mmol creatinine; p less than 0.001). The findings support that the cysteinyl-leukotrienes are potential mediators of allergen-induced asthma and that the release of LTE4 and 11-dehydro-TXB2 into the urine appeared to be a direct and dose-dependent effect of the antigen-antibody reaction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clustering based on clinicophysiologic parameters yielded 4 stable and reproducible clusters that associate with different pathobiological pathways.