BACKGROUND.Currently, screening for ovarian cancer is not recommended for the general population. Targeting women with specific symptoms for screening has been evaluated only recently, because it was believed that symptoms had limited specificity.METHODS.A case‐control study of 149 women with ovarian cancer, including 255 women who were in a screening program and 233 women who were referred for pelvic/abdominal ultrasound, was conducted by inviting women to complete a survey of symptoms. Patients were divided randomly into an exploratory group and a confirmatory group. Symptom types, frequency, severity, and duration were compared between cases and controls. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine which factors independently predicted cancer in the exploratory group and then were used to develop a symptom index, which was tested for sensitivity and specificity in the confirmatory group.RESULTS.Symptoms that were associated significantly with ovarian cancer were pelvic/abdominal pain, urinary urgency/frequency, increased abdominal size/bloating, and difficulty eating/feeling full when they were present for <1 year and occurred >12 days per month. In a logistic regression analysis, symptoms that were associated independently with cancer were pelvic/abdominal pain (P < .001), increased abdominal size/bloating (P<.001), and difficulty eating/feeling full (P = .010). A symptom index was considered positive if any of those 6 symptoms occurred >12 times per month but were present for <1 year. In the confirmatory sample, the index had a sensitivity of 56.7 for early‐stage disease and 79.5% for advanced‐stage disease. Specificity was 90% for women age >50 years and 86.7% for women age <50 years.CONCLUSIONS.Specific symptoms in conjunction with their frequency and duration were useful in identifying women with ovarian cancer. A symptom index may be useful for identifying women who are at risk. Cancer 2007. © 2006 American Cancer Society.
To compare the normal extrahepatic portion of the fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein (FIUV) with varix of the FIUX, we prospectively measured the diameter of the FIUV in 150 uncomplicated second and third trimester pregnancies and compared these results with retrospective review of nine fetuses with varix of the FIUV as an isolated prenatal sonographic finding. The diameter of the normal FIUV increases linearly from approximately 3 mm at 15 menstrual weeks to approximately 8 mm at term (R = 0.92). The nine fetuses with FIUV varix had a FIUV diameter 6 to 12 standard deviations above the mean for age. Four (44%) of the nine fetuses with FIUV varix subsequently died, including one with trisomy 21. One of the remaining fetuses developed severe hydrops 2 weeks after the initial detection of the FIUV varix. FIUV varix appears to carry an increased risk of adverse fetal outcome, including fetal demise.
Clinical outcomes of 95 second-trimester fetuses prospectively considered to have echogenic bowel at ultrasound were compared with a control group of 110 consecutive second-trimester fetuses. Among the 95 fetuses in the study group, 64 (67%) had moderately echogenic (grade 2) or markedly echogenic (grade 3) bowel relative to the liver. Among the 110 fetuses in the control group, only two (1.8%) had moderately echogenic (grade 2) bowel; the rest (98.2%) had isoechoic (grade 0) or midly echogenic (grade 1) bowel relative to the liver. Adverse outcomes occurred in 45 of the 95 fetuses (47%) with echogenic bowel compared with eight of the 110 fetuses (7.27%) in the control group (P < .01; relative risk, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.2, 13.1). Adverse outcomes included chromosomal abnormalities, intrauterine growth retardation, fetal demise, or other fetal anomalies. Within the study group, adverse outcomes occurred in 40 of the 64 fetuses (62%) with grade 2 or 3 bowel echogenicity, compared with five of the 31 fetuses (16%) with grade 1 echogenicity. Echogenic bowel is associated with an increased risk of adverse fetal outcome and this risk is confined primarily to grades 2 and 3 echogenicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.