Radiographs of 20 plastinated human cadaveric lower legs were obtained in 12 positions of rotation to determine the optimal parameter for reliable assessment of syndesmotic and ankle integrity, and to assess the effect of positioning of the ankle on this parameter. Three observers measured eight parameters twice after four repetitions of ankle positioning. Intraclass correlation coefficients and reproducibility were assessed. Some tibiofibular overlap was present in all radiographs in any position of rotation. The medial clear space was smaller than or equal to the superior clear space in all radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficients of the other parameters were too weak for reliable quantitative measurements, as was shown with a mixed model analysis of variance. This resulted from the inability to reproduce ankle positioning, even under optimal laboratory circumstances. This study shows that no optimal radiographic parameter exists to assess syndesmotic integrity. Tibiofibular overlap and medial and superior clear space are the most useful, because one-sided traumatic absence of tibiofibular overlap may be an indication of syndesmotic injury, and a medial clear space larger than a superior clear space is indicative of deltoid injury. Additional quantitative measurement of all syndesmotic parameters with repeated radiographs of the ankle cannot be done reliably and therefore are of little value.

Inadequacies in health care practices have been reported despite existing guidelines to manage hip or knee osteoarthritis. To facilitate guideline implementation and improve utilization of non-surgical treatment options a care strategy should be developed. This study describes the development of an evidence-based, multidisciplinary, patient-centered, stepped care strategy. A national, multidisciplinary, steering group developed the strategy in three phases: (1) consensus among steering group members (first draft); (2) written consultation of 23 representatives of patient organizations and professional associations involved in osteoarthritis care (second draft); (3) consensus of the final draft after discussion in two rounds during a conference with representatives from the different disciplines. The final stepped care strategy presents, in three tiers, the optimal order for non-surgical treatment modalities. It recommends that more advanced options should only be considered if options listed in previous steps failed to produce satisfactory results. Hence, the first step treatment options can be offered to all patients but may also be provided through self care (education, life style advice, and acetaminophen). The second step (exercise therapy, dietary therapy, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and third step treatment options (multidisciplinary care, intra-articular injections, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) can be considered for people with persisting complaints. Trough a consensus procedure, we succeeded to develop a multidisciplinary, patient-centered, stepped care strategy based on national guidelines. This strategy provides a framework for health care providers and patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis to discuss the optimal timing of the various treatment options.

Sectioning of the ATiFL results in mechanical instability of the syndesmosis. Of all trauma mechanisms, external rotation of the ankle resulted in the largest and most consistent displacements of the fibula relative to the tibia found at the syndesmosis. Based on our findings and the current literature, we recommend that patients with isolated PTiFL or AD injuries should be treated functionally when no other injuries are present. Patients with acute complete ATiFL ruptures, or combined ATiFL and AD ruptures should be treated with immobilization in a plaster. Patients with combined ruptures of the ATiFL, AD and PTiFL need to be treated with a syndesmotic screw.

We studied the feasibility of clinical tests in the diagnosis of syndesmotic injury of the ankle. 9 investigators examined 12 persons twice, including 2 patients with an arthroscopically-confirmed syndesmotic injury. They sat behind a curtain that exposed only the lower legs. We found a statistically significant relation between the final arthroscopic diagnosis and the squeeze, fibula translation, Cotton, and external rotation tests as well as for limited dorsal flexion. None of the syndesmotic tests was uniformly positive in chronic syndesmotic injury. The external rotation test had the fewest false-positive results, the fibula translation test the most. The external rotation test had the smallest inter-observer variance. The physical diagnosis was missed in one fifth of all examinations. When in accordance with medical history and physical examination, positive stress tests should raise a high index of suspicion of syndesmotic instability. The final diagnosis of such instability, however, should be made by additional diagnostic imaging and/or arthroscopy.

It appears the suture-button behaves similarly to the syndesmotic screw in the syndesmotic rupture injury model tested. Clinical trials are needed to determine how the device performs in vivo.