Scale-up of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) is important to generating practical levels of power for undersea devices. Sustained operation of many sensors and communications systems require power in the range of 0.6 mW to 20 W. Small scale SMFC systems evaluated primarily in the laboratory indicate power densities for typical graphite plate anodes on the order of 10-50 mW m 22 . However, previous work also suggests that SMFC power production may not scale directly with size. Here, we describe a combination of lab and field studies to evaluate scale up for carbon fabric anodes with a projected surface area ranging from 25 cm 2 to 12 m 2 . The results indicate that power generation scales almost linearly with anode size up to about 1-2 m 2 of projected surface area. Our model suggests that anodes larger than this can experience significant reduction in power density, confirming laboratory observations. These results suggest that the majority of losses along the anode surface occur closest to the electronics, where the amount of current passing along an anode is the greatest. A multi-anode approach is discussed for SMFCs, suggesting that scale-up can be achieved using segmented anode arrays.

In situ amendment of surface sediment with activated carbon is a promising technique for reducing the availability of hydrophobic organic compounds in surface sediment. The present study evaluated the performance of a logistically challenging activated carbon placement in a high-energy hydrodynamic environment adjacent to and beneath a pier in an active military harbor. Measurements conducted preamendment and 10, 21, and 33 months (mo) postamendment using in situ exposures of benthic invertebrates and passive samplers indicated that the targeted 4% (by weight) addition of activated carbon (particle diameter ≤74 µm) in the uppermost 10 cm of surface sediment reduced polychlorinated biphenyl availability by an average (± standard deviation) of 81 ± 11% in the first 10 mo after amendment. The final monitoring event (33 mo after amendment) indicated an approximate 90 ± 6% reduction in availability, reflecting a slight increase in performance and showing the stability of the amendment. Benthic invertebrate census and sediment profile imagery did not indicate significant differences in benthic community ecological metrics among the preamendment and 3 postamendment monitoring events, supporting existing scientific literature that this approximate activated carbon dosage level does not significantly impair native benthic invertebrate communities. Recommendations for optimizing typical site-specific assessments of activated carbon performance are also discussed and include quantifying reductions in availability and confirming placement of activated carbon. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:1767-1777. Published 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

In this study, multiple reaction mechanisms in cathodes of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) were characterized by using cyclic voltammetry and microelectrode measurements of dissolved oxygen and pH. The cathodes were acclimated in SMFCs with sediment and seawater from San Diego Bay. Two limiting current regions were observed with onset potentials of approximately +400 mVAg/AgCl for limiting current I and -120 mVAg/AgCl for limiting current II. The appearance of two catalytic waves suggests that multiple cathodic reaction mechanisms influence cathodic performance. Microscale oxygen concentration measurements showed a zero surface concentration at the electrode surface for limiting current II but not for limiting current I, which allowed us to distinguish limiting current II as the conventional oxygen reduction reaction and limiting current I as a currently unidentified cathodic reaction mechanism. Microscale pH measurements further confirmed these results.

No abstract

Sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) are being developed as potential energy sources where remote sensing and monitoring would be useful. Several energy harvesting techniques for SMFCs have emerged, but effects of these different strategies on startup, performance, and microbial community are not well understood. We investigated these effects by comparing a continuous energy harvesting (CEH) strategy with an intermittent energy harvesting (IEH) strategy. During startup, IEH systems immediately produced higher power and were cathode limited. CEH systems exhibited a gradual power increase and were anode-limited during startup. Both system types produced similar amounts of steady-state power, 1.5 mW ft −2 (16 mW m −2 ) when optimized. However, an IEH system using unoptimized settings could not be subsequently switched to optimal settings and produce expected power levels. The choice of energy harvester did not appear to significantly affect steady-state community structure. Anodes were dominated by γ-and δ-proteobacteria while α-and γ-proteobacteria dominated cathodes. The results suggest performance and community structure are unaffected by energy harvesting strategy, but that startup conditions influence the initial amount of harvested energy and steady-state performance, suggesting future investigations into optimizing startup of these systems are critical for rapidly generating maximum power. Sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) are currently being explored as persistent energy sources for remote sensors and communications in various environments. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] SMFCs are able to generate electrical current from chemical redox gradients at the sediment-water interface. Specifically, they utilize biologically catalyzed chemical reactions to oxidize organic carbon at the anode in the sediment. [9][10][11] This is typically coupled with oxygen reduction in the water column at a cathode. By putting an electronic load between the anode and cathode, useful energy can be derived to power different payloads.In order to maximize the power output of SMFCs, it is presumed that both microbial community and the energy harvesting systems need to be performing optimally. Several energy harvesting strategies have emerged in literature. Two predominant strategies involve either a potentiostatic operation 12-17 or a capacitor charging operation. 5,7,[18][19][20][21] In SMFC applications, the cell potential -the difference between cathode and anode potentials-can be kept constant manually adjusting the external load or automatically by using electronic feedback control. This potentiostatic method may cause potential oscillations as the correct external load is determined by the feedback control circuit, but generally these can be avoided because the current response of the MFC to load change is quite slow in comparison. The net effect here is that the SMFC cell potentials are considered constant and current is continuously flowing in one direction. Thus, we call this type of strategy "continuous energy harvesting" (CE...