BackgroundParticipant non-adherence and loss to follow-up can compromise the validity
of clinical trial results. An assessment of these issues was made in a
3-year tuberculosis prevention trial among HIV-infected adults in
Botswana.Methods and FindingsBetween 11/2004–07/2006, 1995 participants were enrolled at eight
public health clinics. They returned monthly to receive bottles of
medication and were expected to take daily tablets of isoniazid or placebo
for three years. Non-adherence was defined as refusing tablet ingestion but
agreeing to quarterly physical examinations. Loss to follow-up was defined
as not having returned for appointments in ≥60 days. Between
10/2008–04/2009, survey interviews were conducted with 83
participants identified as lost to follow-up and 127 identified as
non-adherent. As a comparison, 252 randomly selected adherent participants
were also surveyed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to
identify associations with selected risk factors. Men had higher odds of
being non-adherent (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 2.24; 95%
confidence interval [95%CI]
1.24–4.04) and lost to follow-up (AOR 3.08; 95%CI
1.50–6.33). Non-adherent participants had higher odds of reporting
difficulties taking the regimen or not knowing if they had difficulties (AOR
3.40; 95%CI 1.75–6.60) and lower odds associated with
each year of age (AOR 0.95; 95%CI 0.91–0.98), but other
variables such as employment, distance from clinic, alcohol use, and
understanding study requirements were not significantly different than
controls. Among participants who were non-adherent or lost to follow-up,
40/210 (19.0%) reported that they stopped the medication because
of work commitments and 33/210 (15.7%) said they thought they had
completed the study.ConclusionsMen had higher odds of non-adherence and loss to follow-up than women.
Potential interventions that might improve adherence in trial participants
may include:targeting health education for men, reducing barriers,
clarifying study expectations, educating employers about HIV/AIDS to help
reduce stigma in the workplace, and encouraging employers to support
employee health.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00164281
Objective
Thirty-six months of isoniazid preventive therapy (36IPT) was superior to 6 months of IPT (6IPT) in preventing tuberculosis (TB) among HIV-infected adults in Botswana. We assessed the posttrial durability of this benefit.
Design
A 36-month double-blind placebo controlled trial (1 : 1 randomization) with recruitment between November 2004 and July 2006 and observation until June 2011.
Methods
One thousand, nine hundred and ninety-five participants were followed in eight public health clinics. Twenty-four percent had a tuberculin skin test ≥5 mm (TST-positive). A minimum CD4+ lymphocyte count was not required for enrolment. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was provided in accordance with Botswana guidelines; 72% of participants retained by June 2011 had initiated ART. Multivariable analysis using Cox regression analysis included treatment arm, TST status, ART as a time-dependent variable and CD4+ cell count at baseline and updated at 36 months.
Results
In the posttrial period, 2.13 and 2.14 per 100 person-years accumulated, whereas 0.93 and 1.13% TB incidence rates were observed in the 36IPT and 6IPT arms, respectively (P = 0.52). The crude hazard ratio of TB during the trial and posttrial was 0.57 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.33, 0.99] and 0.82 (95% CI 0.46, 1.49), and when restricted to TST-positive participants was 0.26 (95% CI 0.08, 0.80) and 0.40 (95% CI 0.15, 1.08), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that ART use was associated with reduced death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.75) but not TB (0.92, 95% CI 0.55–1.53) in the posttrial period.
Conclusion
The benefit of 36IPT for TB prevention declined posttrial in this cohort. Adjunctive measures are warranted to prevent TB among HIV-infected persons receiving long-term ART in TB-endemic settings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.