IntroductionBased on expert opinion the length of antibiotic treatment for pleural infection in adults is typically recommended to be a minimum of four weeks. This clinical trial aimed to assess whether shorter antibiotic courses lead to more treatment failures than standard longer courses.MethodsIn an open-label randomised controlled trial adult patients with pleural infection who were medically treated and stabilised within 14 days of admission were randomised to either a short antibiotic course (total course 14–21 days) or a long antibiotic course (total course 28–42 days). Patients were excluded if their baseline RAPID score was >4 (high-risk category). The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment failure by 6 weeks post admission. Secondary outcomes were total length of antibiotic treatment, proportion of patients who resumed normal activity levels within 6 weeks post admission, time from discharge to resuming normal activity levels and the incidence of antibiotic-related adverse reactions.ResultsBetween September 2020 and October 2021 50 patients (35 (70%) males, mean age 46±13.7 years), were recruited to the trial and randomly assigned to the short course group (n=25) or the long course group (n=25) with outcome data available for 24 patients in each study group. Treatment failure occurred in 4 (16.7%) patients in the short course group and 3 (12.5%) patients in the long course group. In the intention-to-treat analysis the odds ratio for treatment failure in the long course group was 0.714 (95% CI 0.142–3.600, p=0.683). The median duration of antibiotic treatment in the short course group was 20.5 [18–22.5] days compared to 34.5 [32–38] days in the long course group (p <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the other outcomes.ConclusionIn medically treated adult patients with pleural infection a long course of antimicrobial therapy did not lead to less treatment failures in comparison to a shorter course. These findings need to be confirmed in a larger multi-centre trial.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.