The role of drug-level monitoring among patients using direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is unclear. We aimed to investigate its 'real-life' utilization and effect on clinical management. A review of records of patients who underwent DOAC level testing during 2013-2017. Overall, 212 patients (median age 77 years) underwent 292 DOAC measurements [apixaban (n = 147), rivaroxaban (n = 102), dabigatran (n = 43)]. Monitoring volume increased by 460% during study period. DOAC level testing was performed during routine follow-up in 51 (17.5%) cases, whereas the remaining 241 (82.5%) measurements were performed due to selected clinical circumstances, most commonly: bleeding (n = 60), perioperative status (n = 45), breakthrough thrombosis (n = 37) and renal failure (n = 35). Drug levels were within the expected range in 210 (71.9%), above the expected range in 62 (21.2%) and lower than expected range in 20 (6.8%). In multivariate analysis, older age (P = 0.005), lower glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.001) and lower body mass index (P = 0.006) were associated with DOAC levels above the expected range. Clinical decisions were affected by DOAC monitoring following most (140/241, 58.1%) measurements for which we identified an indication for testing; yet only rarely when monitoring was performed during routine follow-up (7.8%, 4/51) (P < 0.0001). While no benefit of routine DOAC monitoring was observed, drug level measurement has an important role in the management of patients in selected circumstances. Age, body weight and creatinine clearance were found to be significant predictors of drug levels. Future studies are warranted to establish associations between drug levels and outcomes, and better delineate the role of DOAC monitoring.

Summary Patients with type I Gaucher Disease (GD) may have a clinically significant bleeding tendency that is disproportionate to their platelet count. We hypothesized that impaired platelet adhesion might contribute to bleeding tendency. Adult patients with type I GD with platelet counts ≥130 × 109/l and haematocrit ≥30% (n = 48), obligatory carriers (n = 52), and healthy controls (n = 19) were studied. Platelet adhesion, using the IMPACT‐R (Cone and Plate(let) Analyser), and platelet aggregation were determined. Type I GD patients had significantly lower platelet adhesion [surface coverage %, median (interquartile range)] 4·6 (3·2–7·5), compared to controls, 8·7 (7·6–10·3), or carriers, 8·1 (6·5–9·4; P = 0·001). Platelet adhesion was not affected by the use of disease‐specific enzyme replacement therapy but was improved in patients after splenectomy, 7·2 (5·8–9·3). Mixing tests showed that the reduced adhesion was an intrinsic platelet defect. Mucosal bleeding was reported in 17 (35·4%) patients and was associated with abnormal adhesion [P = 0·037, with an Odds Ratio (95% confidence interval) of 5·73 (1·1–29·6)]. Five patients (22%) had reduced platelet aggregation, all of whom had reduced platelet adhesion. Platelet aggregation defect was not associated with mucosal bleeding. In conclusion, platelet adhesion defect is a major thrombocytopathy in type I GD patients and can explain part of the increased tendency to bleeding.

IVC filters are placed in many cases for prophylactic indications. Their low retrieval rates together with relatively high risk of long-term complications, questions their extensive utilization. Prospective trials addressing the safety and efficacy of IVC filters are still warranted.

Neonatal thrombocytopenia presented following almost one-tenth of pregnancies with ITP. New pregnancy-onset disease was the only prognostic marker for neonatal thrombocytopenia. This finding could contribute to risk stratification and individualized patient management.

To evaluate the impact of an institutional protocol on patterns of use and outcomes of inferior vena cava filters (IVCF). Following a multidisciplinary effort, an institutional protocol involving dedicated follow-up of patients receiving IVCF and a physician education program regarding IVCF utilization, was established. We prospectively collected data of patients who received IVCF during 2015-2016, following protocol implementation (POST group). For comparison, we reviewed records of patients who received IVCF during 2009-2014, before implementation of the institutional protocol (PRE group). In the PRE and POST groups, 76 and 38 IVCF per year were inserted respectively, with an overall decrease of 50%. IVCF were more likely to be placed for therapeutic rather than prophylactic indications in the POST compared to the PRE group (P = 0.003). Follow-up rates at our coagulation clinic were significantly higher in the POST than the PRE group (100 vs. 22.9%, P < 0.0001), as were rates of attempted retrieval: 60.5% (23/38) vs. 16.7% (76/455), P < 0.0001. Failed retrieval occurred at similar rates: 15.8% (12/76) vs. 18.2% (4/22), P = 0.75. There was a trend towards a lower thrombotic complication rate in the POST than the PRE group: 2.6 vs. 11.2%, P = 0.16. Implementation of an institutional protocol significantly decreased the use of IVCF and increased the retrieval rate. Such intervention could potentially lead to lower rates of IVCF-related complications in the future.