BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested that ultrasound (US) guidance during embryo transfer might improve pregnancy rates. METHODS: A prospective randomized (computer-generated random table) trial was performed to compare embryo transfer under abdominal US guidance (n ⍧ 255 women) with clinical touch embryo transfer (n ⍧ 260). RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate was 26.3% (67/255) in the US-guided transfer group compared with 18.1% (47/260) in the clinical touch transfer group (P < 0.05). The implantation rate was 11.1% (100/903) in the US group compared with 7.5% (66/884) in the clinical touch group (P < 0.05). US-guided transfer was associated with a decrease in the difficulty of the transfers: 97% of transfers were easy in the US-guided group compared with 81% in the clinical touch group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: US-guided embryo transfer increased pregnancy and implantation rates in IVF cycles, as well as the frequency of easy transfers. It is suggested that the decrease in cervical and uterine trauma can play a role in the increase in pregnancy rates associated with USguided transfer. It is recommended that embryo transfer should be performed under US guidance.

No abstract

The PR obtained with CC stimulation was approximately half that obtained with FSH. There was a trend to lower multiple PR with CC. It is recommended that each case should be considered on an individual basis and the treatment options discussed with patients. In our opinion, CC could be a reasonable approach for young women with good prognosis, whereas in the remaining cases FSH would be the preferable method.

Objective:To compare the results of intrauterine insemination (IUI) when GnRH antagonist was added-to avoid IUI on weekend-with those obtained with the standard IUI protocol. Study design:In an IUI program under ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins when one or more follicles of 15-16 mm were seen, if it was not possible for logistic reasons (weekend) to perform the insemination 72 h later, GnRH antagonist was administered until human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. The IUI was performed on Monday. We compared the results of this IUI "weekend-free" group with our results in standard IUI cycles, where IUI was performed 36-38 h after reaching optimal follicular growth. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding the main demographic parameters, except for higher estradiol levels, due to the prolonging ovarian stimulation. The per cycle pregnancy rate (PR) were very similar in both groups: 15.7% in the weekend-free IUI versus 16.5% in standard IUI. The multiple pregnancy rate and the hyperstimulation rate were also similar. A non-significant trend to higher high-order multiple pregnancy was observed in the weekendfree IUI. Conclusions: In IUI cycles under ovarian suprastimulation with gonadotrophins, the use of GnRH antagonist allows the manipulation of the follicular development in such a way that it is possible to avoid inseminations on the weekends, without apparently reducing the PR.

Rennin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been involved in sperm function, even so, little is known about the implication of one of the RAS axis formed by Ang-(1–7) (angiotensin-(1–7)) and MAS receptor. Hence, in the present work, we focused on elucidating the function of the MAS receptor in human spermatozoa. We analyzed the expression and localization of MAS receptor in human spermatozoa and we observed if its activation is able to modulate the sperm motility of normal motility and/or asthenozoospermic patients, as well as, the acrosome reaction of the spermatozoa. MAS receptor is present in human mature spermatozoa, not only at the mRNA level but also at protein level. MAS is localized at the acrosome region, as well as, in the tail of spermatozoa. The sperm incubation with MAS agonist Ang-(1–7) activates at dose-dependent manner the PI3K/AKT pathway (P < 0.01 vs control) and improves the motility of asthenozoospermic patients (P < 0.01 vs control), which is blocked by the specific antagonist (A779) (P < 0.01), but it do not modulate the acrosome reaction. These findings suggest that the ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis may be a useful biochemical tool for the treatment of male infertility related to sperm mobility.