Thirteen women chronically using low-dose estrogen-containing oral contraceptives (50 micrograms or less of ethinyl estradiol or its equivalent for a minimum of 3 months) and 12 age-matched drug-free control women received a single 25 mg oral dose of doxylamine succinate in the fasting state. Ten women taking oral contraceptives and ten controls received a single 50 mg oral dose of diphenhydramine hydrochloride. Multiple plasma samples drawn during 30 hours following the dose of doxylamine, and 12 hours after diphenhydramine dosage, were analyzed by gas chromatography using nitrogen-phosphorus detection. Mean pharmacokinetic variables for doxylamine in control and oral contraceptive groups were: peak plasma concentration, 103 vs 100 ng/ml; time of peak, 2.40 vs 1.87 hours after dosage, elimination half-life, 10.1 vs 10.2 hours; and total clearance, 3.70 vs 3.88 ml/min/kg. Mean pharmacokinetic variables for diphenhydramine in control and oral contraceptive groups were: peak plasma concentration, 63.7 vs 73.8 ng/ml; time of peak, 2.7 vs 2.2 hours after dosage; elimination half-life, 6.0 vs 5.1 hours; and total clearance, 21.8 vs 25.5 ml/min/kg. None of these differences were statistically significant. Thus, low-dose estrogen-containing oral contraceptives do not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of the antihistamines doxylamine or diphenhydramine.

The effect of cigarette smoking on drug oxidation and conjugation was studied using antipyrine and acetaminophen as marker compounds. For the antipyrine study, healthy cigarette smokers (n = 30) and nonsmoking controls (n = 53) received a single 1.0-gram intravenous dose of antipyrine. For the acetaminophen study, 14 smokers and 15 nonsmokers received a 650-mg intravenous dose of acetaminophen. The clearance of antipyrine was significantly increased (0.93 vs. 0.60 ml/min/kg, p < 0.0001) and elimination half-life was correspondingly reduced (8.9 vs. 13.0 h, p < 0.0001) in smokers compared to nonsmoking controls. Total recovery of antipyrine and metabolites excreted in urine did not differ between groups, but there was a significantly increased fractional clearance of antipyrine via formation of 4-hydroxyantipyrine and 3-hydroxymethyl metabolites in smokers. Fractional clearance via formation of norantipyrine did not differ significantly between groups. Comparison of acetaminophen kinetics between smokers and nonsmokers indicated no significant differences in elimination half-life, clearance or volume of distribution. Thus, cigarette smoking is more likely to induce drug oxidation rather than drug conjugation. However, not all oxidative pathways are equally influenced; induction effects of smoking are highly substrate selective and pathway specific.

The pharmacokinetics of antipyrine following a single 1-g intravenous dose was determined in 63 healthy women. Subjects were divided into 4 groups as follows: 1) cigarette smokers using low-dose oral contraceptives (n = 15); 2) nonsmokers using low-dose oral contraceptives (n = 12); 3) cigarette smokers not using oral contraceptives (n = 10); and 4) controls, neither cigarette smokers nor oral contraceptive users. Plasma antipyrine concentrations during 24 to 48 hours after dosage were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Mean kinetic variables in the nonsmoking, non-oral contraceptive using control group were: volume of distribution, 37.7 L; elimination half-life, 13.2 hours; and clearance, 34.4 mL/min. In cigarette smoking, non-oral contraceptive users versus controls, elimination half-life was reduced (8.0 vs. 13.2 hours, P < 0.05) and clearance increased (56.0 vs. 34.4 mL/min, P < 0.05). In nonsmoker oral contraceptive users, the reverse was true (elimination half-life was significantly increased: 16.6 vs. 13.2 hours, P < 0.05; and clearance was significantly decreased: 24.8 vs. 34.4 mL/min, P < 0.05). In smokers who were using oral contraceptives, values were not significantly different from controls (elimination half-life, 11.2 hours; clearance, 39.5 mL/min). Volume of distribution did not differ among the four groups. Thus the opposing effects on antipyrine clearance of the induction of metabolism by cigarette smoking and the inhibition due to low dose oral contraceptive use in effect negate each other when combined in humans.