Background Differential artery-vein (AV) analysis in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) holds promise for the early detection of eye diseases. However, currently available methods for AV analysis are limited for binary processing of retinal vasculature in OCTA, without quantitative information of vascular perfusion intensity. This study is to develop and validate a method for quantitative AV analysis of vascular perfusion intensity. Method A deep learning network AVA-Net has been developed for automated AV area (AVA) segmentation in OCTA. Seven new OCTA features, including arterial area (AA), venous area (VA), AVA ratio (AVAR), total perfusion intensity density (T-PID), arterial PID (A-PID), venous PID (V-PID), and arterial-venous PID ratio (AV-PIDR), were extracted and tested for early detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Each of these seven features was evaluated for quantitative evaluation of OCTA images from healthy controls, diabetic patients without DR (NoDR), and mild DR. Results It was observed that the area features, i.e., AA, VA and AVAR, can reveal significant differences between the control and mild DR. Vascular perfusion parameters, including T-PID and A-PID, can differentiate mild DR from control group. AV-PIDR can disclose significant differences among all three groups, i.e., control, NoDR, and mild DR. According to Bonferroni correction, the combination of A-PID and AV-PIDR can reveal significant differences in all three groups. Conclusions AVA-Net, which is available on GitHub for open access, enables quantitative AV analysis of AV area and vascular perfusion intensity. Comparative analysis revealed AV-PIDR as the most sensitive feature for OCTA detection of early DR. Ensemble AV feature analysis, e.g., the combination of A-PID and AV-PIDR, can further improve the performance for early DR assessment.
Purpose To evaluate the sensitivity of normalized blood flow index (NBFI) for detecting early diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of healthy controls, diabetic patients without DR (NoDR), and patients with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR) were analyzed in this study. The OCTA images were centered on the fovea and covered a 6 mm × 6 mm area. Enface projections of the superficial vascular plexus (SVP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) were obtained for the quantitative OCTA feature analysis. Three quantitative OCTA features were examined: blood vessel density (BVD), blood flow flux (BFF), and NBFI. Each feature was calculated from both the SVP and DCP and their sensitivities to distinguish the three cohorts of the study were evaluated. Results The only quantitative feature capable of distinguishing all three cohorts was NBFI in the DCP image. Comparative study revealed that both BVD and BFF were able to distinguish the controls and NoDR from mild NPDR. However, neither BVD nor BFF was sensitive enough to separate NoDR from the healthy controls. Conclusions The NBFI has been demonstrated as a sensitive biomarker of early DR, revealing retinal blood flow abnormality better than traditional BVD and BFF. The NBFI in the DCP was verified as the most sensitive biomarker, supporting that diabetes affects the DCP earlier than SVP in DR. Translational Relevance NBFI provides a robust biomarker for quantitative analysis of DR-caused blood flow abnormalities, promising early detection and objective classification of DR.
As one modality extension of optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCTA) provides unparalleled capability for depth-resolved visualization of retinal vasculature at the microcapillary level resolution. For OCTA image construction, repeated OCT scans from one location are required for temporally vascular connectivity (TVC), i.e., OCT signal variance among sequential images, to identify blood vessels with active blood flow. The requirement for multi-scan-volumetric OCT can reduce OCTA imaging speed, which will induce eye movements, and limit the image field-of-view. In principle, the blood flow should also affect the spatially vascular connectivity (SVC), i.e., reflectance brightness profile along the vessel direction, in a single-scan-volumetric OCT. In other words, the SVC in single-scan-volumetric OCT might be equivalent to the TVC in multi-scan-volumetric OCT for high fidelity OCTA construction. In this article, we report an SVC network (SVC-Net) for deep learning OCTA construction from single-scan-volumetric OCT. The effect of SVC for deep learning OCTA was evaluated by SVC-based speckle variance calculation, revealing three adjacent B-scans has the optimal performance. We further compare the effects of SVC with three adjacent B-scans and a single B-scan inputs into SVC-Net. The structural-similarity index measure (SSIM) loss function was selected to optimize deep learning contrast enhancement of microstructures, such as microcapillaries, in OCT. This was verified by comparative analysis of the SVC-Net performances with SSIM and mean-squared-error (MSE) loss functions. The combination of SVC involvement and SSIM loss function enabled microcapillary resolution OCTA construction from single-scan-volumetric OCT. The performance of the SVC-Net was verified with OCT datasets from both superficial and deep vascular plexus in mouse and human eyes.
Major retinopathies can differentially impact the arteries and veins. Traditional fundus photography provides limited resolution for visualizing retinal vascular details. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) can provide improved resolution for retinal imaging. However, it cannot discern capillary-level structures due to the limited image contrast. As a functional extension of OCT modality, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive, label-free method for enhanced contrast visualization of retinal vasculatures at the capillary level. Recently differential artery–vein (AV) analysis in OCTA has been demonstrated to improve the sensitivity for staging of retinopathies. Therefore, AV classification is an essential step for disease detection and diagnosis. However, current methods for AV classification in OCTA have employed multiple imagers, that is, fundus photography and OCT, and complex algorithms, thereby making it difficult for clinical deployment. On the contrary, deep learning (DL) algorithms may be able to reduce computational complexity and automate AV classification. In this article, we summarize traditional AV classification methods, recent DL methods for AV classification in OCTA, and discuss methods for interpretability in DL models.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate layer fusion options for deep learning classification of optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) images. A convolutional neural network (CNN) end-to-end classifier was utilized to classify OCTA images from healthy control subjects, diabetic patients with no retinopathy (NoDR), and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). For each eye, three en-face OCTA images from the superficial capillary plexus (SCP), deep capillary plexus (DCP), and choriocapillaris (CC) layers were acquired. The performances of the CNN classifier with individual layer inputs and multi-layer fusion architectures, including early-fusion, intermediate-fusion, and late-fusion, were quantitatively compared. For individual layer inputs, the superficial OCTA was observed to have the best performance, with 87.74% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 91.08% specificity, to differentiate control, NoDR, and NPDR. For multi-layer fusion options, the best option is the intermediate-fusion architecture, which achieved 93.18% accuracy, 87.45% sensitivity, and 94.55% specificity. To interpret the deep learning performance, the Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was utilized to identify spatial characteristics for OCTA classification. Comparative analysis indicates that the layer data fusion options can affect the performance of deep learning classification, and the intermediate-fusion approach is optimal for OCTA classification of DR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.