Objectives:To analyze complications associated with minimally invasive cochlear implantation by comparing data from different centers, to discuss major reasons for complications, and to refine implantation techniques to decrease them.Patients:Patients who underwent cochlear implantation at our center by the same surgeon (the corresponding author of this article) from March 2006 to March 2015 were enrolled.Intervention:First, a retrospective analysis of the complications associated with minimally invasive cochlear implantation at our center was performed. Second, published reports from other centers that describe complications were reviewed. Differences between complications in our cohort and other studies were evaluated.Main Outcome Measure:Strategies for reducing complications were assessed and modifications in surgical protocol proposed accordingly.Results:In total, 1,014 patients underwent 1,065 cochlear implantations. There were 28 complications (7 major, 21 minor) and only 2 reimplantations for the entire cohort, with no case of severe infection, flap necrosis, or device extrusion. The major complications were electrode misplacement, magnet displacement, implant failure secondary to trauma, and temporary cerebrospinal fluid leakage. The rates of major complications in our cohort were very low (0.6%) compared with those in the literature.Conclusion:Preoperative surgical planning based on individual patient anatomy and employment of soft surgical techniques can minimize surgical complications.
Electrode impedance values were significantly lower in the mCI group than in the CI surgery group at initial activation (5.01 kOhm vs 6.10 kOhm, respectively, F = 13.761, p = 0.000). The differences between the two groups were most prominent for the electrodes located at the basal region of the cochlea.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.