Despite the rapid rise in diversity and quantities of engineered nanomaterials produced, the impacts of these emerging contaminants on the structure and function of ecosystems have received little attention from ecologists. Moreover, little is known about how manufactured nanomaterials may interact with nutrient pollution in altering ecosystem productivity, despite the recognition that eutrophication is the primary water quality issue in freshwater ecosystems worldwide. In this study, we asked two main questions: (1) To what extent do manufactured nanoparticles affect the biomass and productivity of primary producers in wetland ecosystems? (2) How are these impacts mediated by nutrient pollution? To address these questions, we examined the impacts of a citrate-coated gold nanoparticle (AuNPs) and of a commercial pesticide containing Cu(OH) nanoparticles (CuNPs) on aquatic primary producers under both ambient and enriched nutrient conditions. Wetland mesocosms were exposed repeatedly with low concentrations of nanoparticles and nutrients over the course of a 9-month experiment in an effort to replicate realistic field exposure scenarios. In the absence of nutrient enrichment, there were no persistent effects of AuNPs or CuNPs on primary producers or ecosystem productivity. However, when combined with nutrient enrichment, both NPs intensified eutrophication. When either of these NPs were added in combination with nutrients, algal blooms persisted for >50 d longer than in the nutrient-only treatment. In the AuNP treatment, this shift from clear waters to turbid waters led to large declines in both macrophyte growth and rates of ecosystem gross primary productivity (average reduction of 52% ± 6% and 92% ± 5%, respectively) during the summer. Our results suggest that nutrient status greatly influences the ecosystem-scale impact of two emerging contaminants and that synthetic chemicals may be playing an under-appreciated role in the global trends of increasing eutrophication. We provide evidence here that chronic exposure to Au and Cu(OH) nanoparticles at low concentrations can intensify eutrophication of wetlands and promote the occurrence of algal blooms.

Increasing concern about climate change is prompting organisations to mitigate their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Waste management activities also contribute to GHG emissions. In the waste management sector, there has been an increasing diversion of waste sent to landfill, with much emphasis on recycling and reuse to prevent emissions. This study evaluates the carbon footprint of the different processes involved in waste management systems, considering the entire waste management stream. Waste management data from the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (RBK), London (UK), was used to estimate the carbon footprint for its (RBK) current source segregation system. Secondly, modelled full and partial co-mingling scenarios were used to estimate carbon emissions from these proposed waste management approaches. The GHG emissions from the entire waste management system at RBK were 12,347 tonnes CO2e for the source segregated (SS) scenario, and 11,907 tonnes CO2e for the partial comingled (PC) model. These emissions amount to 203.26 kg CO2e/tonne and 196.02 kg CO2e/tonne MSW for SS and PC, respectively. The change from a source segregation fleet to a partial co-mingling fleet reduced the emissions, at least partly due to a change in the number and type of vehicles.