Purpose This study was meant to determine the effect of time to plasma separation, storage duration, freeze-thawing cycle and dilution proportion on the HIV-1 viral load level. Methods Experimental study design was employed by collecting 10mL whole blood samples into two EDTA tubes from 88 eligible HIV infected patients at St Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College. The viral load test was done using Abbott m2000sp/rt analyzer. Data was entered into Microsoft excel and analyzed by SPSS version 20. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to compare HIV RNA viral load mean difference between different time to plasma separation, storage, freeze-thawing cycles and dilution levels. Post-hoc analysis was employed to locate the place of significant differences. P value less than 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance while viral RNA level of 0.5 log copies/ml was used to determine clinical significance. Results There was significant HIV-1 RNA viral load log mean difference between plasma separation time at 6 hours (hrs) and 24hrs (p<0.001). There was also significant HIV-1 RNA viral load log mean difference between plasma tested within 6hrs and those stored at 2–8°C for 15 days (p = 0.006), and between plasma stored at 2–8°C for 6 days versus 15 days (p<0.001). There was significant log mean difference between plasma that was exposed to fourth cycle of freeze-thawing after storage at -20°C when compared with plasma tested within 6hrs (p = 0.013). Conclusion Plasma separated at 24hrs, stored at 2–8°C for 15 days or freeze-thawed for four cycles had significant effect on HIV viral load level. However, the differences were not clinically significant at a cut-off viral load level of 0.5 log copies/ml. Avoiding delays to plasma separation beyond 24 hrs, storing at 2–8°C for 15 days and freeze-thawing for no more than 4 cycles is recommended to improve the result quality.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) specimen handling needs a major concern due to the virus has a potential of easily transmittable to health care workers and laboratory personnel. Heat inactivation before nucleic acid isolation might permit safe testing, even though, the effect of heat inactivation on SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR detection results needs to be determined. Methods: An experimental study was conducted in Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) from September 25 to October 15, 2020. A total of 188 Oro-pharyngeal swabs were collected from COVID-19 suspected cases, referred to EPHI for SARS COV-2 testing during the study period. One group of the sample was inactivated at 56 °C heat for 30 min, and the other group was stored at 4°C for a similar period of time. RNA extraction and detection were done by DAAN Gene extraction and detection kit. Abbott m2000 RT-PCR was used for amplification and detection. Data analysis was done by using SPSS version 23.0; Chi-square and Pearson correlation test for qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis were used. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Results: Out of 188 total samples, 117 (62.2 %) and 118 (62.8%) were positive for ORF1a/b and N gene respectively before inactivation. Whereas after inactivation, 111 (59 %) was ORF1a/b and 116 (61.7 %) was N gene positive. Rate of positivity between groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The mean CT value difference between the two groups of ORF1a/b gene and N gene was 0.042 (95 % CI, -0.247- 0.331; t= 0.28; p = 0.774) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.097 - 0.682; t =2.638; p = 0.010) respectively.Conclusion: Heat inactivation at 56 ℃ for 30 min has not statistically significant effect for the qualitative rRT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2. However, the finding also showed that there was statistically significant CT value increment after heat inactivation compared to untreated samples. Therefore, false-negative results with high CT value results (CT > 35) were found to be the challenge of this protocol. Hence alternative inactivation methods should be investigated and further studies should be considered.