Objective: To explore medical students’ views on support services, stigma, and teaching of wellbeing in light of their experiences of stress and distress. Design, participants and setting: Quantitative survey of medical students at five universities in Australia and New Zealand in November 2007. Main outcome measures: Medical students’ experiences of support services, stigma attached to undergoing stress and distress, and teaching of wellbeing. Results: 1328 students completed the survey (26% response rate). Seventy‐one per cent of students were aware of support services at their university. Of these, 46% believed the services were adequately promoted, and 49% had either used the services themselves or knew someone who had. Overall, 70% of students had their own general practitioner, but this fell to 45% for international students (P < 0.001). Fifty‐five per cent of students believed there was a stigma associated with being a medical student undergoing stress and distress. Fifty‐six per cent of students believed they had formal teaching on stress and distress. Students most wanted to learn methods to help somebody else cope and preferred to be taught through formal lectures. Conclusion: Medical curricula on wellbeing should include strategies for self‐help and giving assistance to others, and aim to decrease stigma. Adequate and well‐promoted support services are required to complement this teaching, in particular for international students.
The Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) has recently launched the Critical Care Airway Management eLearning modules to support emergency medicine trainees in developing their airway management skills in the ED. A team of emergency physicians and trainees worked collaboratively to develop the eLearning resources ensuring extensive stakeholder consultation. A comprehensive resource manual was written to provide learners with knowledge that underpins the modules. ACEM provided project coordination as well as administrative and technical team support to the production. Although specifically developed with early ACEM trainees in mind, it is envisaged the resources will be useful for all emergency clinicians. The project was funded by the Australian Commonwealth Department of Health.
Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used in practice to investigate for cord or discoligamentous injury following blunt trauma and a normal computed tomography (CT). This study investigates the MRI findings and surgical outcomes of patients in this cohort. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients following trauma with suspected cervical spine injury from 2016 to 2019. Inclusion criteria included patients receiving a normal CT of the cervical spine and subsequent MRI due to cervical spine injury symptomatology (persistent tenderness and/or neurology). Inclusion criteria included: age ≥16 years, alert and <72 h from CT to MRI. Mann-Whitney and χ 2 statistical analysis techniques were employed. Results: Two hundred and twentyeight patients with persistent midline tenderness and/or persistent neurology following blunt trauma and negative CT report were included. One hundred and eighty-one patients received an MRI for persistent tenderness of which 35 revealed abnormal MRI findings. Twenty-one cases required no treatment, 14 cases were treated with a rigid collar with no patients requiring operative management. Forty-seven patients received an MRI for neurological symptoms following blunt trauma and negative CT, with 11 abnormal MRI findings. Management included no treatment (three cases), application of rigid collar (six cases) and operative management (two cases). Conclusion: No alert neurologically intact patient with 'persistent tenderness only' received operative management following a normal CT examination. While MRI is sensitive for detecting soft tissue injuries, the prevalence for detecting clinically significant cervical spine injury in blunt trauma patients in the absence of neurology is low. The utility of MRI in this cohort is questionable considering prolonged spinal immobilisation is not without harm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.