Objective: The purpose of this study is to decrease wait time and improve access to developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP) evaluation in children 4 years of age and younger as part of a quality improvement (QI) initiative in an urban safety-net hospital. Methods: A primary care pediatrician received DBP minifellowship training 6 hours per week for 1 year to become a developmentally-trained primary care clinician (DT-PCC). DT-PCCs then conducted developmental evaluations that consisted of using a Childhood Autism Rating Scale and Brief Observation of Symptoms of Autism to evaluate children 4 years and younger referred within the practice. Baseline standard practice involved a 3-visit model: DBP advanced practice clinician (DBP-APC) intake visit, neurodevelopmental evaluation by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician (DBP), and feedback by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician. Two QI cycles were completed to streamline the referral and evaluation process. Results: Seventy patients with a mean age of 29.5 months were seen. The average days to initial developmental assessment decreased from 135.3 days to 67.9 days with a streamlined referral to the DT-PCC. Of the 43 patients who required further evaluation by a DBP, the average days to developmental assessment reduced from 290.1 to 120.4 days. Conclusion: Developmentallytrained primary care clinicians allowed for earlier access to developmental evaluations. Further research should explore how DT-PCCs can improve access to care and treatment for children with developmental delays.

Objectives: Autistic individuals report lower health care satisfaction. However, there is currently no set of "best practice" standards about caring for autistic individuals. In this exploratory study, we aim to identify features of Autism Friendly practice according to a sample consisting of mainly professionals whose interests include autism using a modified 3-round Delphi-a method that identifies a consensus view across subject participants. Methods: Statements about components of an Autism Friendly health care practice were compiled in consultation with the steering committee of an Autism Friendly Initiative at a single, urban academic safetynet hospital. Participants were recruited through our national network of professionals and patients/families mailing list. Examples of invited professionals included researchers, health care workers, and educators. In the first 2 rounds, we distributed electronic surveys to participants, who scored statements from 1 to 9 regarding importance. In round 2, statements that were scored low by all stakeholder groups were eliminated. Seventyeight participants responded to the first-round survey, and 51 participants responded to the second-round survey. In the third round, 38 participants ranked 16 statements from most to least important. Statements are summarized and presented in the Results section. Results: Topics that emerged from highly ranked statements include environmental/operational modifications (e.g., longer appointment times) and staff training to support autistic patients. Conclusion: Highly ranked statements represented previously reported barriers, including the need for staff training and inclusive engagement with the autistic community. The findings can help inform health care organizations to determine priorities when building an Autism Friendly health care practice.

No abstract

No abstract