Wildlife agencies typically attempt to manage carnivore numbers in localized game management units through hunting, and do not always consider the potential influences of immigration and emigration on the outcome of those hunting practices. However, such a closed population structure may not be an appropriate model for management of carnivore populations where immigration and emigration are important population parameters. The closed population hypothesis predicts that high hunting mortality will reduce numbers and densities of carnivores and that low hunting mortality will increase numbers and densities. By contrast, the open population hypothesis predicts that high hunting mortality may not reduce carnivore densities because of compensatory immigration, and low hunting mortality may not result in more carnivores because of compensatory emigration. Previous research supported the open population hypothesis with high immigration rates in a heavily hunted (hunting mortality rate = 0.24) cougar population in northern Washington. We test the open population hypothesis and high emigration rates in a lightly hunted (hunting mortality rate = 0.11) cougar population in central Washington by monitoring demography from 2002 to 2007. We used a dual sex survival/fecundity Leslie matrix to estimate closed population growth and annual census counts to estimate open population growth. The observed open population growth rate of 0.98 was lower than the closed survival/ fecundity growth rates of 1.13 (deterministic) and 1.10 (stochastic), and suggests a 12-15% annual emigration rate. Our data support the open population hypothesis for lightly hunted populations of carnivores. Low hunting mortality did not result in increased numbers and densities of cougars, as commonly believed because of compensatory emigration.
Recolonizing species exhibit unique population dynamics, namely dispersal to and colonization of new areas, that have important implications for management. A resulting challenge is how to simultaneously model demographic and movement processes so that recolonizing species can be accurately projected over time and space. Integrated population models (IPMs) have proven useful for making inference about population dynamics by integrating multiple data streams related to population states and demographic rates. However, traditional IPMs are not capable of representing complex dispersal and colonization processes, and the data requirements for building spatially explicit IPMs to do so are often prohibitive. Contrastingly, individual-based models (IBMs) have been developed to describe dispersal and colonization processes but do not traditionally integrate an estimation component, a major strength of IPMs. We introduce a framework for spatially explicit projection modeling that answers the challenge of how to project an expanding population using IPM-based parameter estimation while harnessing the movement modeling made possible by an IBM. Our model has two main components: (1) a Bayesian IPM-driven age- and state-structured population model that governs the population state process and estimation of demographic rates, and (2) an IBM-driven spatial model describing the dispersal of individuals and colonization of sites. We applied this model to estimate current and project future dynamics of gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Washington State, USA. We used data from 74 telemetered wolves and yearly pup and pack counts to parameterize the model, and then projected statewide dynamics over 50 years. Mean population growth was 1.29 (95% CRI 1.26-1.33) during initial recolonization from 2009-2020 and decreased to 1.03 (IQR 1.00-1.05) in the projection period (2021-2070). Our results suggest that gray wolves have a >99% probability of colonizing the last of Washington State's three specified recovery regions by 2030, regardless of alternative assumptions about how dispersing wolves select new territories. The spatially explicit modeling framework developed here can be used to project the dynamics of any species for which spatial spread is an important driver of population dynamics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.