Measuring the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube on CT images is precise and reproducible, and reflects the length measured intraoperatively. However, it does not seem have a prognostic value.
ObjectivesTo present nine patients with an abnormal widened bony Eustachian tube running anteriorly in the skull base through the sphenoid bone.MethodsPatients with a particular anomaly in the bony Eustachian tube incidentally found on CT examinations were registered consecutively over a period of four years.ResultsNine patients had the anomaly, eight unilaterally and one bilaterally. All our patients had additional anomalies involving the outer, middle, and/or inner ear.ConclusionThe consequences of this anomaly remain unknown, but the presence of the widened, bony ET should increase the awareness for complex temporal bone deformities and vice versa.Level of Evidence4.
ObjectivesWe aim to develop an imaging technique for visualization of the Eustachian tube (ET) lumen.Study DesignA prospective, experimental study in an animal model and in human cadaver specimens.MethodsApplying iodixanol to the middle ear in two human temporal bone specimens, followed by computed tomography (CT) examinations, we optimized contrast dilution, CT algorithm, and head positioning for visualization of contrast passage through the ET.Myringotomy was performed on eight rabbits. Based on the cadaver study, a 20% iodixanol solution was applied to the middle ear, and subsequent CT scans were performed to observe iodixanol in the epipharynx. For some animals, the procedure was repeated on the contralateral ear. We performed the procedure twice on four subjects. Twenty examinations were included.Iodixanol appearance in the ET and the epipharyngeal orifice was assessed qualitatively on CT scans. The tympanic membrane was inspected after 1 or 2 weeks, and histopathological examination of six contrast‐exposed temporal bones was performed.ResultsThe cadaver study provided information on imaging technique and contrast dosage. In rabbits, iodixanol passed through the ET in 19 of the 20 ears. Qualitatively, optimal visualization was seen after 9 to 12 minutes. Clinical inspection after 1 or 2 weeks revealed normal middle ear status. Histopathological samples showed no sign of inflammatory reaction in the tympanic membrane, middle ear, or ET.ConclusionIodixanol application to the middle ear is feasible, safe, and demonstrates patency of the ET.Level of EvidenceN/A.
The HEARO cochlear implantation surgery aims to replace the conventional wide mastoidectomy approach with a minimally invasive direct cochlear access. The main advantage of the HEARO access would be that the trajectory accommodates the optimal and individualized insertion parameters such as type of cochlear access and trajectory angles into the cochlea. To investigate the quality of electrode insertion with the HEARO procedure, the insertion process was inspected under fluoroscopy in 16 human cadaver temporal bones. Prior to the insertion, the robotic middle and inner ear access were performed through the HEARO procedures. The status of the insertion was analyzed on the post-operative image with Siemens Artis Pheno (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). The completion of the full HEARO procedure, including the robotic inner ear access and fluoroscopy electrode insertion, was possible in all 16 cases. It was possible to insert the electrode in all 16 cases through the drilled tunnel. However, one case in which the full cochlea was not visible on the post-operative image for analysis was excluded. The post-operative analysis of the electrode insertion showed an average insertion angle of 507°, which is equivalent to 1.4 turns of the cochlea, and minimal and maximal insertion angles were recorded as 373° (1 cochlear turn) and 645° (1.8 cochlear turn), respectively. The fluoroscopy inspection indicated no sign of complications during the insertion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.