This essay examines the origins of the relationship between Choh Hao Li and the University of California, Berkeley. Li came to the United States from China in 1935 for graduate study at the University of Michigan, but ended up enrolling at Berkeley. Over the course of the next two decades, Li went from being a foreign graduate student in chemistry on a temporary visa to an internationally recognized leader in the biochemistry of endocrinology at the head of his own laboratory and a naturalized citizen of the United States. At what was otherwise a dark time for Americans of Chinese descent, Li was garnering adulation in the popular press. He was called the "master of the master gland" for his successes both in isolating and in synthesizing pituitary hormones. Specifically, the essay explores the making of the "master of the master gland" from the perspectives of the history of science and the history of race and migration in the United States, tracing the interplay among Li's scientific work, his migrations, his career aspirations, and his legal status in the United States. A Chinese intellectual cast adrift by the shifting geopolitics of World War II and the early Cold War, Li danced delicately along the margins of membership in American society during the 1940s, only arriving at what turned out to be his final destination after careful and protracted negotiations with officials of the U.S. government, with influential members of the international scientific community, and with representatives of the University of California, Berkeley.
American Exodus begins with a riddle about one of its subjects. "Louey Shuck was an American immigrant," Charlotte Brooks writes, "but he did not immigrate to America" (p. 1). Like many a good riddle, this one rests on unrecognized assumptions about its key terms. Louey was born an American, but Louey-along with thousands of other Chinese Americans like him in the early twentieth century-was forced to seek opportunity outside the land of opportunity. Brooks estimates that as many as half of the pre-WWII Chinese American second generation may have immigrated to China in search of better life chances-numbers that rival, albeit in percentage terms, the numbers of African Americans fleeing the Jim Crow South during the same years. Yet, despite its obvious significance, what Brooks at one point calls the "Chinese Great Migration" has attracted relatively little sustained historical attention. Drawing on archival collections in the United States, China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, American Exodus remedies this deficiency with a finely grained, comprehensive examination of the origins of the exodus, its flourishing through the political turmoil of the late Qing and the early republican periods, its gradual curtailment during the Nanjing Decade, and its ultimate ending-along with the return of many of the migrants-during and after World War II.Throughout, Brooks pays close attention to the ways that the immigrants' hybrid identities-expressed most significantly in their dual nationality, but in other meaningful ways, as well-drew them to spaces in China that offered ready fields for realizing their pent-up aspirations. These "in-between zones" (p. 193) included places, like Hong Kong, where the local economy and social order were flexible enough to accommodate the ambitions of outsiders who were Chinese-though not Chinese in quite the same ways that the locals were Chinese.The slotting together of the immigrants' hybridity with zones of ambiguity in China made for a complex, shifting terrain of opportunities. Their dual citizenship, for example, conferred competitive social and economic advantages as well as potentially important legal protections. Unlike most other foreigners, as Chinese citizens they could live outside of the treaty ports and foreign concessions, and own property there, too. They could hold government or military positions denied to foreigners-even very high government 122
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.