Summary Background Sleep disturbances are common, and perhaps are even more prevalent in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Aim To determine the effect of measured sleep on: 1) IBS symptoms the following day, and IBS-specific quality of life (IBS-QOL), and 2) non-GI pain symptoms. Methods IBS patients’ sleep patterns were compared to healthy individuals via wrist-mounted actigraphy over 7 days. Daily bowel pain logs (severity, distress; 10-point Likert), stool pattern (Bristol scale) and supporting symptoms (e.g., bloating, urgency; 5-point Likert) were kept. Validated measures, including the GI Symptom Rating Scale-IBS, Visceral Sensitivity Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the IBS-Quality of Life were collected. Mediation analysis explored the relationship between sleep, mood, and bowel symptoms. Results 50 subjects (38.6±1.0years old, 44 female; 24 IBS and 26 healthy controls) completed sleep monitoring. IBS patients slept more hours per day (7.7±0.2 vs 7.1±0.1, p=0.008), but felt less well-rested. IBS patients demonstrated more waking episodes during sleep (waking episodes; 12.1 vs 9.3, p<0.001). Waking episodes predicted worse abdominal pain (p≤0.01) and GI distress (p<0.001), but not bowel pattern or accessory IBS symptoms (p>0.3 for each). Waking episodes negatively correlated with general- and IBS-specific QOL in IBS (r= −0.58 and −0.52, p<0.001 for each). Disturbed sleep effects on abdominal pain were partially explained by mood as an intermediate. Conclusion Sleep disturbances are more common in IBS, and correlate with IBS-related pain, distress, and poorer IBS-related QOL. Disturbed sleep effects extend beyond the bowel, leading to worse mood and greater somatic pain in IBS patients.

Psychiatric and EIFD comorbidities are common in FGID, decrease HRQOL and are associated with greater GI symptom burdens; these factors were stronger predictors of HRQOL than GI symptoms in FGID patients.

Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common abdominal pain disorder without an organic explanation. Abuse histories (physical, sexual, emotional) are prevalent in IBS. While abuse relates to mood disorders (depression and anxiety) also common in IBS, the influence of abuse on GI symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and its independence from psychological symptom comorbidity, has not been studied. Methods Consecutive GI outpatients completed the ROME III Research Diagnostic Questionnaire and questionnaires on trauma (Life-Stress Questionnaire), mood (Beck Depression/Anxiety Inventories), somatic symptoms (PHQ-12) and HRQOL (SF-36). Current GI symptom Severity and Bother were assessed using 10-cm VAS scales. Key Results 272 ROME-defined IBS (47.6±0.9 yrs, 81% female) and 246 non-FGID (51.6±1.0 yrs, 65% female) subjects participated. IBS patients reported greater rates of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse (p < 0.006 each), and higher depression, anxiety, and somatic symptoms (p < 0.001). Greater bowel symptom bother (7.4±0.2 vs 6.7±0.2, p=0.040), severity (7.7±0.2 vs 6.5±0.2, p<0.001), recent symptomatic days (9.8±0.4 vs. 8.5±0.3, p=0.02), and poorer HRQOL (40.9±2.3 vs 55.5±1.7, p<0.001) were noted in IBS with abuse. Abuse effects were additive, with greater IBS symptom severity and poorer HRQOL noted in cases with multiple forms of abuse. Mediation analyses suggested that abuse effects on GI symptoms and HRQOL were partially mediated by mood. Conclusions & Inferences Abuse experiences common among IBS sufferers are associated with reports of greater GI symptoms and poorer HRQOL, particularly in those with multiple forms of abuse; this relationship may be partially mediated by concomitant mood disturbances.

Background Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) have efficacy in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Some clinicians use TCAs to treat residual symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients already on decisive IBD therapy or with quiescent inflammation, although this strategy has not been formally studied. Goals The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of TCA therapy in IBD patients with residual symptoms, despite controlled inflammation, in a retrospective cohort study. Study Inclusion required initiation of TCA for persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. IBD patients had inactive or mildly active disease with persistent symptoms despite adequate IBD therapy as determined by their physician. Symptom response was compared with IBS patients. Established Likert scales were used to score baseline symptom severity (0 = no symptoms, 3 =severe symptoms) and TCA response (0= no improvement; 3 = complete satisfaction). Results Eighty-one IBD [41.3 ± 1.7y, 56F; 58 Crohn's disease/23 ulcerative colitis (UC)] and 77 IBS (46.2 ± 1.7y, 60F) patients were initiated on a TCA therapy. Baseline symptom scores (IBD, 2.06 ± 0.03; IBS, 2.12 ± 0.04; P = 0.15) and symptom response to TCA therapy (IBD, 1.46 ± 0.09; IBS, 1.30 ± 0.09; P = 0.2) were similar in both the groups. At least moderate improvement (Likert score ≥ 2) on TCA was achieved by comparable proportions of patients (59.3% IBD vs. 46% IBS; P = 0.09). Within IBD, response was better with UC than Crohn's disease (1.86 ± 0.13 vs. 1.26 ± 0.11, respectively, P = 0.003). Conclusions In a clinical practice setting, TCA use led to moderate improvement of residual gastrointestinal symptoms in IBD patients for whom escalation of IBD therapy was not planned. UC patients demonstrated higher therapeutic success. IBD symptom responses were similar to IBS patients.

SUMMARY Background The beta-2 adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) is an important target for epinephrine, a neurotransmitter in pain signalling. ADRB2 haplotypes affect receptor expression and ligand response, and have been linked to painful non-GI disorders. Aims To assess whether ADRB2 polymorphisms (rs1042713, rs1042714) are risk alleles for functional GI (FGID) and extraintestinal functional (EIFD) diagnoses, and whether ADRB2 predicts GI symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods Of 398 subjects (49.6 ± 2.9 years, 68.0% female), 170 (42.5%) met Rome III criteria for ≥1 FGID [IBS (n = 139, 34.9%); functional dyspepsia (FD, n = 136, 34.1%), functional chest pain (FCP, n = 25, 6.2%)], while 228 were healthy controls. FGID subjects reported on bowel symptom severity and burden (10-cm VAS), frequency (days/last 2 weeks), EIFD, psychiatric diagnoses and HRQOL (SF 36). Multivariable models determined the contribution of ADRB2 polymorphisms to HRQOL, and mediational analyses assessed functional diagnoses as potential intermediates. Results rs1042714 minor G alleles were associated with FGID diagnoses (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.7; P = 0.009), particularly FD (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3–3.3), with trends towards IBS (P = 0.19) and FCP (P = 0.06) diagnoses. Within IBS, G allele carriers had more severe bowel symptoms (P = 0.025), and symptomatic days (P = 0.009). G allele carriers had greater numbers of EIFD (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.07, P < 0.001) and poorer HRQOL. The effect of ADRB2 on HRQOL was partially mediated by FGID, EIFD and psychiatric diagnoses. Conclusions ADRB2 minor alleles at rs1042714 predict FGID and EIFD, and may influence bowel symptom severity and HRQOL. These findings provide indirect evidence of sympathetic nervous system role in FGID pathophysiology.