Histone acetylation is a ubiquitous hallmark of transcription, but whether the link between histone acetylation and transcription is causal or consequential has not been addressed. Using immunoblot and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing in S. cerevisiae, here we show that the majority of histone acetylation is dependent on transcription. This dependency is partially explained by the requirement of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) for the interaction of H4 histone acetyltransferases (HATs) with gene bodies. Our data also confirms the targeting of HATs by transcription activators, but interestingly, promoter-bound HATs are unable to acetylate histones in the absence of transcription. Indeed, HAT occupancy alone poorly predicts histone acetylation genome-wide, suggesting that HAT activity is regulated post-recruitment. Consistent with this, we show that histone acetylation increases at nucleosomes predicted to stall RNAPII, supporting the hypothesis that this modification is dependent on nucleosome disruption during transcription. Collectively, these data show that histone acetylation is a consequence of RNAPII promoting both the recruitment and activity of histone acetyltransferases.

bHistone H3 lysine 36 methylation is a ubiquitous hallmark of productive transcription elongation. Despite the prevalence of this histone posttranslational modification, however, the downstream functions triggered by this mark are not well understood. In this study, we showed that H3K36 methylation promoted the chromatin interaction of the Isw1b chromatin-remodeling complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Similar to H3K36 methylation, Isw1b was found at the mid-and 3= regions of transcribed genes genome wide, and its presence at active genes was dependent on H3K36 methylation and the PWWP domain of the Isw1b subunit, Ioc4. Moreover, purified Isw1b preferentially interacted with recombinant nucleosomes that were methylated at lysine 36, and this interaction also required the Ioc4 PWWP domain. While H3K36 methylation has been shown to regulate the binding of numerous factors, this is the first time that it has been shown to facilitate targeting of a chromatin-remodeling complex. Chromatin, a nucleoprotein structure that packages DNA in all eukaryotes, serves as a barrier to numerous nuclear processes, such as transcription, replication, and DNA repair. Numerous mechanisms exist for alteration of chromatin structure, including histone posttranslational modifications, the incorporation of histone variants, and the activity of chromatin-remodeling complexes. There are many examples of these processes functioning in the same pathway, such as histone acetylation, which promotes the binding of the RSC and SWI/SNF remodeling complexes to chromatin (7, 11).Chromatin-remodeling complexes are multisubunit complexes that use the hydrolysis of ATP to disrupt histone-DNA contacts, promoting octamer sliding and histone eviction. Isw1b, a chromatin-remodeling complex found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, consists of three subunits: Isw1, Ioc2, and Ioc4 (31). This complex localizes to the transcribed regions of genes, where it has been implicated in transcription elongation, termination, and pre-mRNA processing (19). While there have been some insights into how the Isw1b complex functions, how it is targeted to specific regions of the genome is unknown.Transcriptionally active genes are packaged with histones that are mono-, di-, or trimethylated on lysines 4 and 36 of histone H3. Lysine 4 methylation is catalyzed by Set1 as part of the COMPASS complex, which is targeted to transcribed genes through interaction with RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) during the early stages of transcription elongation (26). Lysine 36 methylation is generated by the histone methyltransferase Set2, which similarly interacts with elongating RNAP II, albeit at later stages of elongation. Consistent with the differential interactions of Set1 and Set2 with the various forms of elongating RNAP II, lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) is predominantly found at the 5= ends of transcribed genes, while lysine 36 di-and trimethylation (H3K36me2 and H3K36me3) are found in the mid-and 3= regions (26).Histone methylation is proposed to act as a docking site for proteins that m...

Histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) is a hallmark of transcription initiation, but how H3K4me3 is demethylated during gene repression is poorly understood. Jhd2, a JmjC domain protein, was recently identified as the major H3K4me3 histone demethylase (HDM) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although JHD2 is required for removal of methylation upon gene repression, deletion of JHD2 does not result in increased levels of H3K4me3 in bulk histones, indicating that this HDM is unable to demethylate histones during steady-state conditions. In this study, we showed that this was due to the negative regulation of Jhd2 activity by histone H3 lysine 14 acetylation (H3K14ac), which colocalizes with H3K4me3 across the yeast genome. We demonstrated that loss of the histone H3-specific acetyltransferases (HATs) resulted in genome-wide depletion of H3K4me3, and this was not due to a transcription defect. Moreover, H3K4me3 levels were reestablished in HAT mutants following loss of JHD2, which suggested that H3-specific HATs and Jhd2 serve opposing functions in regulating H3K4me3 levels. We revealed the molecular basis for this suppression by demonstrating that H3K14ac negatively regulated Jhd2 demethylase activity on an acetylated peptide in vitro. These results revealed the existence of a general mechanism for removal of H3K4me3 following gene repression.Gcn5 | histone acetylation | histone methylation | Sas3

The FACT (FAcilitates Chromatin Transactions) complex is a conserved complex that maintains chromatin structure on transcriptionally active genes. Consistent with this, FACT is enriched on highly expressed genes, but how it is targeted to these regions is unknown. In vitro, FACT binds destabilized nucleosomes, supporting the hypothesis that FACT is targeted to transcribed chromatin through recognition of RNA polymerase (RNAP)-disrupted nucleosomes. In this study, we used high-resolution analysis of FACT occupancy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to test this hypothesis. We demonstrate that FACT interacts with nucleosomes in vivo and that its interaction with chromatin is dependent on transcription by any of the three RNAPs. Deep sequencing of micrococcal nucleaseresistant fragments shows that FACT-bound nucleosomes exhibit differing nuclease sensitivity compared to bulk chromatin, consistent with a modified nucleosome structure being the preferred ligand for this complex. Interestingly, a subset of FACT-bound nucleosomes may be "overlapping dinucleosomes," in which one histone octamer invades the 147-bp territory normally occupied by the adjacent nucleosome. While the differing nuclease sensitivity of FACT-bound nucleosomes could also be explained by the demonstrated ability of FACT to alter nucleosome structure, transcription inhibition restores nuclease resistance, suggesting that it is not due to FACT interaction alone. Collectively, these results are consistent with a model in which FACT is targeted to transcribed genes through preferential interaction with RNAP-disrupted nucleosomes.

Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) alter chromatin structure by promoting the interaction of chromatinmodifying complexes with nucleosomes. The majority of chromatin-modifying complexes contain multiple domains that preferentially interact with modified histones, leading to speculation that these domains function in concert to target nucleosomes with distinct combinations of histone PTMs. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the NuA3 histone acetyltransferase complex contains three domains, the PHD finger in Yng1, the PWWP domain in Pdp3, and the YEATS domain in Taf14; which in vitro bind to H3K4 methylation, H3K36 methylation, and acetylated and crotonylated H3K9, respectively. While the in vitro binding has been well characterized, the relative in vivo contributions of these histone PTMs in targeting NuA3 is unknown. Here, through genome-wide colocalization and by mutational interrogation, we demonstrate that the PHD finger of Yng1, and the PWWP domain of Pdp3 independently target NuA3 to H3K4 and H3K36 methylated chromatin, respectively. In contrast, we find no evidence to support the YEATS domain of Taf14 functioning in NuA3 recruitment. Collectively our results suggest that the presence of multiple histone PTM binding domains within NuA3, rather than restricting it to nucleosomes containing distinct combinations of histone PTMs, can serve to increase the range of nucleosomes bound by the complex. Interestingly, however, the simple presence of NuA3 is insufficient to ensure acetylation of the associated nucleosomes, suggesting a secondary level of acetylation regulation that does not involve control of HAT-nucleosome interactions.