Background: The treatment of transitional ankle fractures (Tillaux and triplane) is often dictated by the amount of displacement at the articular surface. Although >2 mm is a common indication for operative management, this practice has not been strongly supported by either the pediatric or adult literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether operative treatment of transitional fractures with 2 to 5 mm of intra-articular gap leads to superior functional outcomes compared with cast management. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients treated for distal tibial fractures at a single institution between 2009 and 2017 was conducted. Computed tomographic images obtained after closed reduction were reviewed to identify patients with 2 to 5 mm of displacement (either gap or step-off) at the articular surface of the tibial plafond. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo system. Only patients with functional outcome data (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM]) at a minimum of 2 years after treatment were included. Two multivariable linear regression models were developed using backward stepwise regression with either the FAAM Sports score or the Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Sports score as the dependent variables. Results: Fifty-seven patients (34 with triplane fractures and 23 with Tillaux fractures) with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 2.0 to 9.2 years) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four patients were treated operatively, and 23 patients were treated with closed reduction and cast application. Nonoperative treatment, greater intra-articular gap, and presence of a grade-III complication were associated with worse functional outcomes in both multivariable regression models. A gap after closed reduction remained a negative predictor of functional outcome even in patients who were treated operatively. Patients who were treated nonoperatively and had ≤2.5 mm of gap had a significantly higher mean SANE Sports score at 90% than those patients with >2.5 mm of gap at 75% (p = 0.03). Conclusions: In Tillaux and triplane fractures with 2 to 5 mm of gap at the tibial plafond, a greater gap after closed reduction, nonoperative treatment, and complications were negative predictors of functional outcome at a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Surgical management likely conveys the greatest functional benefit when the intra-articular gap exceeds 2.5 mm. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No abstract

Background: Fixation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis is often performed with a trans-syndesmotic screw (SS) or suture-button (SB). SB fixation has been shown to have lower rates of postoperative syndesmotic malreduction, late diastasis, and implant removal, though some studies have found complications related to infection and implant subsidence. The purpose of this study was to compare maintenance of reduction, complications, implant removal and functional outcomes of SB versus SS fixation in adolescents. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent syndesmotic fixation from 2010 to 2019 at a single institution. Loss of syndesmotic reduction (diastasis) was defined as either a > 2 mm increase in tibiofibular clear space or > 2 mm decrease in tibiofibular overlap, and corresponding incongruence of the ankle mortise (medial clear space 1 millimeter greater than superior clear space). Functional outcomes were collected at a minimum of 1 year postsurgery using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Results: Seventy-seven adolescents (45 SS, 32 SB) were included (mean age: 16 ± 1.5 y). Forty-five patients had Weber C fibula fractures, 27 Weber B fractures, and 5 had isolated syndesmotic injuries or small posterior malleolus fractures. Fifty-one patients (66%) had functional outcomes available. There was no significant difference in mean FAAM Sports score between the 2 groups (SB = 94.8%, SS = 89.8%) at mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 2.1 years. Syndesmotic implant removal occurred in 36/45 patients (80%) in the SS group compared with 4/32 patients (13%) in the SB group. There was 1 case of syndesmotic malreduction requiring revision surgery in the SS group, and no cases of postoperative malreduction or diastasis in the SB group. Nine patients in the SB group and 8 in the SS group weighed over 100 kilograms, with no cases of diastasis in these larger patients. There were 4 superficial infections and 1 deep infection in the screw group, with 1 superficial infection in the SB group. Conclusions: While both SB and screw fixation maintained syndesmotic reduction, SB fixation led to lower rates of implant removal surgery. SB fixation was equally effective at preventing recurrent diastasis in adolescents weighing over 100 kilograms, and functional outcomes were at least equivalent to screw-fixation at mean follow-up of 4.0 years. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background: The purpose of this study was to describe the functional outcomes and complications of unstable supination external rotation (SER) and pronation external rotation (PER) ankle fractures in adolescents. A secondary outcome was to compare functional outcomes of SER stage IV injuries that were treated definitively with closed reduction and cast application to a similar group of minimally displaced fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods: A retrospective review of adolescents aged 10 to 18 years with unstable ankle fractures treated at a single institution between 2009 and 2017 was conducted. All patients had functional outcomes data from the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure obtained at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Results: In total, 67 adolescents (41 SER, 26 PER) were included (mean follow-up: 52.3±24.8 mo). A total of 56 were treated with ORIF and 11 were closed reduced and casted. No patients treated nonsurgically had a loss of reduction and none required subsequent surgical intervention. Preoperative radiographic predictors of syndesmotic injury (>6 mm of tibiofibular clear space or <2 mm of tibiofibular overlap) were not sensitive and only moderately specific predictors of intraoperative syndesmotic injury. There was no difference in functional outcome between the 11 SER stage IV fractures treated nonoperatively and a group of minimally displaced SER injuries treated with ORIF. Patients with open or partially open physes had better functional outcomes. Patients with syndesmotic injuries, medial malleolus fractures, or fracture-dislocations were not associated with lower functional outcome scores in our adolescent cohort. Conclusions: Unstable SER and PER injuries in adolescents have favorable functional outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up, though a minority continue to have impaired ankle function. Minimally displaced SER stage IV injuries with near anatomic alignment after closed reduction can be successfully treated with continued closed management, and have no difference in functional outcomes compared with similar injuries treated with ORIF. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background: Plate fixation has been the traditional technique for fracture repair of unstable ankle injuries with an associated lateral malleolus fracture. Recently, biomechanical and clinical data have demonstrated lag screw only fixation to be an effective alternative to plate fixation in the adult population. This comparison has yet to be studied in the adolescent or pediatric population. The objective of this study was to compare lag screw only fixation with traditional plating for lateral malleolus fractures in adolescents. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 83 adolescents with unstable oblique lateral malleolus fractures treated at a single pediatric level-1 trauma center between 2011 and 2019 with a minimum clinical follow-up until fracture union. Patients were divided into 2 surgical groups: (1) plate fixation (n=51) or (2) lag screw fixation (n=32). Radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications were measured in both groups. Results: All patients in both groups achieved our primary outcome measure of fracture union without loss of reduction. The mean surgical time for subjects treated with a plate was 15 minutes longer (64 vs. 49 min) (P=0.001) and these patients were 3.8 times more likely to have symptomatic implants (P<0.044) than subjects treated with screws. Approximately 50% of the cohort was available by phone for patient-reported outcomes at a mean follow-up of 50 months. The mean Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure sports scores, and return to sports rates were similar (92 vs. 93, 98.2 vs. 98.1, 93.2 vs. 94.0, 95% vs. 86%, respectively; P>0.05) between the 2 treatment methods. Conclusions: Lag screw only fixation is a safe and effective procedure for noncomminuted, oblique fibula fractures in the adolescent population as demonstrated by equivalent fracture healing rates without loss of reduction and similar outcome scores. Given these comparable results with the additional benefits of shorter surgical time and less symptomatic implants, lag screw only fixation should be considered as a viable treatment alternative to traditional lateral plating in the adolescent population. Level of Evidence: Level III.