Background Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) represent a substantial concern, as they are associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality. One option for the management of these patients is balloon kyphoplasty, in which a balloon is inflated within the collapsed vertebral body. Following this, the cavity is filled with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement to restore height and strength. Although this procedure has been shown to have great effectiveness, one complication that has been documented is an adjacent level refracture. This is thought to be due to the increased relative strength of the repaired vertebral body. Our study aims to quantify the rates of adjacent level refracture following balloon kyphoplasty as well as identify factors that may be associated with this event. Methods We reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of patients that underwent balloon kyphoplasty between January 1, 2017 and August 1, 2020. A single surgeon performed all procedures. Only adult patients who received a diagnosis of osteoporosis based on a history of fragility fracture or bone mineral density measurement were included. Patients with additional or confounding bone conditions, such as malignancy or other lytic lesions, were excluded. Data were analyzed in SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States). Results We included 89 patients in our study. We observed an adjacent level refracture prevalence of 13.5% (n=12). We observed a significant increase in refracture rates among patients with unsatisfactory resolution of symptoms following initial balloon kyphoplasty, from 8.2% for satisfactory resolution of symptoms to 43.8% for those with unsatisfactory resolution. (p-value 0.011). Additionally, all 12 patients with adjacent level refractures occurred among patients with complex, multiple-level initial fracture patterns. Conclusions The treatment of OVCF with balloon kyphoplasty is a well-documented and effective method. The prevalence of adjacent-level refracture may be linked to several variables such as the initial fracture pattern. More research is needed to better predict refracture and improve patient outcomes.
The approach for upper extremity surgery brachial plexus blocks depends on the specific nature of the surgery. Interscalene and supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks can cause phrenic nerve palsy. Our aim was to explore the safety of bilateral parasagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (BPBBs) in an outpatient surgery center. Identical BPBBs were performed in two patients with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Neither patient developed respiratory or cardiovascular distress. Brachial plexus blocks on multiple locations are infrequently employed for fear of phrenic nerve paresis. However, given both patients’ success, bilateral parasagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks may provide a safe approach. Keywords: Nerve block, brachial plexus blocks, phrenic nerve, anesthesia, pain
Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% (5 mg/mL) is commonly utilized for analgesia in brachial plexus blocks. We suggest that ultrasound-guided 0.25% (2.5 mg/mL) bupivacaine can be utilized for effective postoperative analgesia to reduce the effective dose. A total of 126 patients underwent ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks with 0.25% bupivacaine. The mean duration of analgesia was 21.95 (σ = 3.93) hours with no complications. Patients that received an infraclavicular block (22.56 σ = 4.02) had a significant increase in analgesia compared to supraclavicular blocks (21.09, σ = 3.69) (p = 0.04). These results suggest that further research is warranted for ultrasound-guided 0.25% bupivacaine in brachial plexus nerve blocks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.