No abstract

No abstract

PurposeIntra-operative imaging plays a key role in screw placement for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Complications have been associated with inadequate screw position. The purpose of this study was to evaluate computed tomography (CT) (3D fluoroscopy) and standard fluoroscopy (C-arm) images as compared with direct anatomic measurement to determine final screw position in a cadaveric SCFE model.MethodsOsteotomy with pinning was performed at the physeal scar in ten cadaveric hips. A standardised approach-withdrawal technique was performed with C-arm images taken at 15° increments. We also obtained a CT (3D fluoroscopy) scan of each hip. The screw tip-subchondral bone (STSB) distance was measured on digital imaging software and also with a digital calliper directly when the femoral head was cut in plane to expose the STSB distance anatomically. Statistical analysis included t-tests and Fisher’s exact test.ResultsModerate SCFE osteotomies were achieved with a mean Southwick angle (39.5° ± 7°). The 60° fluoroscopic image was found to be the most representative image (41% of the time) compared with both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral images (8% and 21%). Both fluoroscopy (2.7 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.001) and CT (1.6 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.03) overestimated the STSB distance compared with direct measurement (0.94 ±  0.51 mm). Two-thirds (67%) of CT measurements were within 1 mm of the cadaveric measurement, while only 20% of C-arm measurements fulfilled this criterion (p = 0.04).ConclusionsBoth standard fluoroscopy and CT overestimated the STSB distance when compared with direct measurement in a cadaveric model of SCFE. Surgeons should be aware of the limitations of intra-operative imaging to determine the STSB distance. We suggest that using the known pitch of a screw (2.9 mm in a 7.3-mm cannulated screw) as an intra-operative tool to help guide screw placement.

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery improves mechanical alignment and the accuracy of surgical cuts in the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A simplified, navigation-enhanced instrumentation system was assessed to determine whether the same effects could be achieved with a less intrusive system. Two cohorts of surgeons (experienced and trainees) performed a series of TKA cuts using models with and without navigation-enhanced instrumentation. The accuracy of each system was determined via the rate of outliers, measured as any cut that deviated from the planned cut by more than 2° or 2 mm. The effect of experience level was limited, with only the outlier rate for tibial varus or valgus measurement showing a significant difference between user groups with conventional instrumentation ( P =.004). The use of navigation-enhanced instrumentation significantly reduced the total outlier rate compared with conventional instrumentation from 35% to 4% for experienced users ( P <.001) and from 34% to 10% for trainees ( P <.001). These results suggest that navigation-enhanced instrumentation is a viable alternative to conventional instrumentation to reduce outlier rates and improve cut accuracy. This trial also showed that additional experience may not correlate with improved surgical accuracy. Outliers may not reflect individual surgical ability as much as limitations of the instrumentation or other unidentified factors. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(1):54–57.]