The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) generates compensatory eye movements in response to angular and linear acceleration sensed by semicircular canals and otoliths respectively. Gaze stabilization demands that responses to linear acceleration be adjusted for viewing distance. This study in humans determined the transient dynamics of VOR initiation during angular and linear acceleration, modification of the VOR by viewing distance, and the effect of unilateral deafferentation. Combinations of unpredictable transient angular and linear head rotation were created by whole body yaw rotation about eccentric axes: 10 cm anterior to eyes, centered between eyes, centered between otoliths, and 20 cm posterior to eyes. Subjects viewed a target 500, 30, or 15 cm away that was extinguished immediately before rotation. There were four stimulus intensities up to a maximum peak acceleration of 2,800 degrees/s2. The normal initial VOR response began 7-10 ms after onset of head rotation. Response gain (eye velocity/head velocity) for near as compared with distant targets was increased as early as 1-11 ms after onset of eye movement; this initial effect was independent of linear acceleration. An otolith mediated effect modified VOR gain depending on both linear acceleration and target distance beginning 25-90 ms after onset of head rotation. For rotational axes anterior to the otoliths, VOR gain for the nearest target was initially higher but later became less than that for the far target. There was no gain correction for the physical separation between the eyes and otoliths. With lower acceleration, there was a nonlinear reduction in the early gain increase with close targets although later otolith-mediated effects were not affected. In subjects with unilateral vestibular deafferentation, the initial VOR was quantitatively normal for rotation toward the intact side. When rotating toward the deafferented side, VOR gain remained less than half of normal for at least the initial 55 ms when head acceleration was highest and was not modulated by target distance. After this initial high acceleration period, gain increased to a degree depending on target distance and axis eccentricity. This behavior suggests that the commissural VOR pathways are not modulated by target distance. These results suggest that the VOR is initially driven by short latency ipsilateral target distance dependent and bilateral target-distance independent canal pathways. After 25 ms, otolith inputs contribute to the target distance dependent pathway. The otolith input later grows to eventually dominate the target distance mediated effect. When otolith input is unavailable the target distance mediated canal component persists. Modulation of canal mediated responses by target distance is a nonlinear effect, most evident for high head accelerations.

Directional asymmetries in vestibular reflexes have aided the diagnosis of vestibular lesions; however, potential asymmetries in vestibular perception have not been well defined. This investigation sought to measure potential asymmetries in human vestibular perception. Vestibular perception thresholds were measured in 24 healthy human subjects between the ages of 21 and 68 years. Stimuli consisted of a single cycle of sinusoidal acceleration in a single direction lasting 1 or 2 s (1 or 0.5 Hz), delivered in sway (leftright), surge (forward-backward), heave (up-down), or yaw rotation. Subject identified self-motion directions were analyzed using a forced choice technique, which permitted thresholds to be independently determined for each direction. Non-motion stimuli were presented to measure possible response bias. A significant directional asymmetry in the dynamic response occurred in 27% of conditions tested within subjects, and in at least one type of motion in 92% of subjects. Directional asymmetries were usually consistent when retested in the same subject but did not occur consistently in one direction across the population with the exception of heave at 0.5 Hz. Responses during null stimuli presentation suggested that asymmetries were not due to biased guessing. Multiple models were applied and compared to determine if sensitivities were direction specific. Using Akaike information criterion, it was found that the model with direction specific sensitivities better described the data in 86% of runs when compared with a model that used the same sensitivity for both directions. Mean thresholds for yaw were 1.3±0.9°/s at 0.5 Hz and 0.9±0.7°/s at 1 Hz and were independent of age. Thresholds for surge and sway were 1.7±0.8 cm/s at 0.5 Hz and 0.7±0.3 cm/s at 1.0 Hz for subjects G50 and were significantly higher in subjects 950 years old. Heave thresholds were higher and were independent of age.

Heading direction is determined from visual and vestibular cues. Both sensory modalities have been shown to have better direction discrimination for headings near straight ahead. Previous studies of visual heading estimation have not used the full range of stimuli, and vestibular heading estimation has not previously been reported. The current experiments measure human heading estimation in the horizontal plane to vestibular, visual, and spoken stimuli. The vestibular and visual tasks involved 16 cm of platform or visual motion. The spoken stimulus was a voice command speaking a heading angle. All conditions demonstrated direction dependent biases in perceived headings such that biases increased with headings further from the fore-aft axis. The bias was larger with the visual stimulus when compared with the vestibular stimulus in all 10 subjects. For the visual and vestibular tasks precision was best for headings near fore-aft. The spoken headings had the least bias, and the variation in precision was less dependent on direction. In a separate experiment when headings were limited to ±45°, the biases were much less, demonstrating the range of headings influences perception. There was a strong and highly significant correlation between the bias curves for visual and spoken stimuli in every subject. The correlation between visual-vestibular and vestibular-spoken biases were weaker but remained significant. The observed biases in both visual and vestibular heading perception qualitatively resembled predictions of a recent population vector decoder model (Gu et al., 2010) based on the known distribution of neuronal sensitivities.

Stability of images on the retina was determined in 14 normal humans in response to rotational and translational perturbations during self-generated pitch and yaw, standing, walking, and running on a treadmill. The effects on image stability of target distance, vision, and spectacle magnification were examined. During locomotion the horizontal and vertical velocity of images on the retina was <4 degrees /s for a visible target located beyond 4 m. Image velocity significantly increased to >4 degrees /s during self-generated motion. For all conditions of standing and locomotion, angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (AVOR) gain was less than unity and varied significantly by activity, by target distance, and among subjects. There was no significant correlation(P > 0.05) between AVOR gain and image stability during standing and walking despite significant variation among subjects. This lack of correlation is likely due to translation of the orbit. The degree of orbital translation and rotation varied significantly with activity and viewing condition in a manner suggesting an active role in gaze stabilization. Orbital translation was consistently antiphase with rotation at predominant frequencies <4 Hz. When orbital translation was neglected in computing gaze, computed image velocities increased. The compensatory effect of orbital translation allows gaze stabilization despite subunity AVOR gain during natural activities. Orbital translation decreased during close target viewing, whereas orbital rotation decreased while wearing telescopic spectacles. As the earth fixed target was moved closer, image velocity on the retina significantly increased (P < 0.05) for all activities except standing. Latency of the AVOR increased slightly with decreasing target distance but remained <10 ms for even the closest target. This latency was similar in darkness or light, indicating that the visual pursuit tracking is probably not important in gaze stabilization. Trials with a distant target were repeated while subjects wore telescopic spectacles that magnified vision by 1.9 or 4 times. Gain of the AVOR was enhanced by magnified vision during all activities, but always to a value less than spectacle magnification. Gain enhancement was greatest during self-generated sinusoidal motion at 0.8 Hz and was less during standing, walking, and running. Image slip velocity on the retina increased with increasing magnification. During natural activities, slip velocity with telescopes increased most during running and least during standing. Latency of the visually enhanced AVOR significantly increased with magnification (P < 0.05), probably reflecting a contribution of the visual pursuit system. The oculomotor estimate of target distance was inferred by measuring binocular convergence, as well as from monocular parallax during head translation. In darkness, target distance estimates obtained by both techniques were less accurate than in light, consistently overestimating for near and underestimating for far targets.

Patients can safely undergo 1.5 T MRI after CI if the device is tightly bound before scanning. Magnet displacement was not observed, and we think the risk to be minimal compared with the risk and inconvenience of removing the magnet before the study.