This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier's archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit:
This paper aims to understand the impact of collaborations on the firm innovation performance. Although some of the previous studies support that external collaborations of firms improves their innovation capabilities, our knowledge on the impact of collaborations on firm innovation performance is still limited. In this research, using innovation survey carried out by Turkish Statistical Institute in 2009 to measure the innovation activities of firms in Turkey between 2006 and 2008, we aim to understand how collaborations influence the innovation performance of firms. We introduce a new indicator to measure the innovation performance of firms which is simply based on the perception of firms regarding to the impacts of innovation. In order to create performance indicators we conducted a factor analysis to group the firms' perceptions on the impacts of innovation. Factor analysis gives us two basic impact of innovation: product and process oriented impacts of innovation. We find out a positive relationship between external collaboration and product oriented impacts of innovation. In other words, firms engaged in external collaboration during the innovation process observe better improvements in their products and markets. External collaboration also brings improvements to the production process of firms.
Startup selection is an essential mechanism of how accelerators create value. Through in-depth case studies of 10 accelerators in Turkey, our research explores the selection process in accelerators. Our findings indicate that accelerators overcome their context’s extreme uncertainty by involving various actors in the selection process and reducing the information asymmetries for investors and startups. Accelerators tend to select effortlessly coachable startups, willing to collaborate with accelerators, mentors, or other actors, and passionate enough to overcome the pressure of creating a business at a fast pace. Our research also exhibits that the selection process serves startups by directing and training them to transmit the right signals to receivers, primarily investors. Accelerators prefer to work with entrepreneurial teams that are coachable, passionate, and collaborative to vibrate the right signals. Similarly, the accelerators’ selection process helps investors by decreasing signaling noise and mitigate information asymmetry. By doing so, accelerators contribute to a well-functioning and more effective entrepreneurship ecosystem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.