Background
Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery (TPS) is traditionally performed under general anaesthesia. This study aimed to compare the effects of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or sevoflurane, an inhalation anaesthetic, on thiol‐disulphide homeostasis in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal TPS.
Methods
In this study, 84 patients scheduled for TPS were randomly categorised into two groups: propofol (n = 42, the TIVA group) or sevoflurane (n = 42, the SEVO group). Blood samples were taken before induction of general anaesthesia and at the 30 minutes of postoperation. Serum native thiol and total thiol levels were detected, and the number of dynamic disulphide bonds and related ratios were calculated from these values. Serum nitric oxide (NO) levels were measured using a chemiluminescence method.
Results
Although native thiol levels in TIVA postoperation group were markedly increased (P < .05), total thiol levels in SEVO postoperation group were significantly decreased (P < .01). Disulphide levels were declined in both groups (P < .05 for TIVA and P = .001 for SEVO groups). Disulphide/native thiol (P < .05 for both groups) and disulphide/total thiol ratios (P < .05 for TIVA and P < .01 for SEVO groups) were depressed in postoperation groups. We found a marked elevation in native thiol/total thiol ratio in both groups (P < .05 for TIVA and P < .01 for SEVO groups). There was significant augmentation in serum NO levels in the SEVO postoperation group (P < .05).
Conclusion
These results are the first to show that both TIVA and sevoflurane showed similar antioxidant effect with reduced disulphide levels, but sevoflurane may offer more robust oxidative stress protection and augmented NO production than TIVA during TPS. However, the clinical effect is needed to further investigate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.