Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) stimulate growth rate in a number of animal species and are likely to contribute to genetic variations of growth potential. The present study was designed to link levels of IGF-I and IGF-II mRNA and peptides with growth rate in divergently selected genotypes of chickens with high (HG) or low (LG) growth rates. Circulating IGF-I and -II and hepatic mRNA levels were measured under ad libitum feeding conditions from 1 to 12 weeks of age, and at 6 weeks of age under three different nutritional conditions (fed, fasted for 16 or 48 h, re-fed for 4 or 24 h after a 48-h fast). IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) were also measured. Circulating IGFs increased with age and were higher in HG chickens from 1 to 6 weeks. They decreased with fasting and only IGF-II was fully restored after 24 h of re-feeding, while IGF-I remained low. A significant decrease in steady state IGF-I mRNA levels was also observed with fasting. Across the nutritional study, hepatic IGF-I mRNAs were significantly higher in HG chickens. Variations of IGF-II mRNA levels with nutritional state or genotype exhibited a similar trend. IGFBP (28, 34 and 40 kDa) levels increased with age, while only faint differences were observed between genotypes. IGFBP-28 transiently increased with fasting and was inversely related to blood glucose and insulin levels, suggesting that it is equivalent to mammalian IGFBP-1. In HG chickens, IGFBP-28 and IGFBP-34 levels decreased markedly following refeeding. Therefore, high and low growth rates were respectively associated with high and low IGF-I and -II levels, supporting the hypothesis of a stimulatory role for both IGFs during post-hatching growth of chickens.
Background: Older persons with frailty take multiple medications and are vulnerable to inappropriate prescribing. Objective: This study assesses the impact of a team-based, pharmacist-led structured medication review process in primary care on the appropriateness of medications taken by older adults living with frailty. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design in 6 primary care practices within an academic clinic in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. We enrolled community dwelling older adults 65 years and older with frailty who have polypharmacy and/or 2 or more chronic conditions (ie, high-risk group for drug-related issues). The intervention was a structured pharmacist-led medication review using evidence-based explicit criteria (ie, Beers and STOPP/START criteria) and implicit criteria (ie, pharmacist expertise) for potentially inappropriate prescribing, done in the context of a primary care team-based seniors’ program. We measured the changes in the number of medications pre- and postmedication review, number of medications satisfying explicit criteria of START and STOPP/Beers and determined the association with frailty level. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (a priori significance level of P < .05). Results: A total of 54 participants (61.1% females, mean age 81.7 years [SD = 6.74]) enrolled April 2017 to May 2018 and 52 participants completed the medication review process (2 lost to hospitalization). Drug-related problems noted on medication review were untreated conditions (61.1%), inappropriate medications (57.4%), and unnecessary therapy (40.7%). No significant changes in total number of medications taken by patients before and after, but the intervention significantly decreased number of inappropriate medications (1.15 meds pre to 0.9 meds post; P = .006). Conclusion: A pharmacist-led medication review is a strategy that can be implemented in primary care to address inappropriate medications.
The pharmacist's role in the management of the drug therapy needs of the post-surgical patient has the potential to improve clinical and patient outcomes and avoid healthcare costs. The inclusion of clinical pharmacists in surgical wards may result in $7 in savings for every $1 invested.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.