No abstract

Audit committees have a relatively long history dating back to the nineteenth century. It is only in recent years that their use has been popularized again in the private sector. Fundamentally, it is often argued that audit committees exist to mediate between executive directors and auditors while providing an overall enhancement of corporate accountability. One of the recent effects of the drive to incorporate business methods into other sectors has been the establishment of audit committees. It does, however, pose the question of the role of these committees which are operating in a different context from their origins. Looks at the operation of audit committees in a defined sector, namely universities. Using a postal questionnaire, all directors of finance (or equivalent) in UK universities were surveyed to establish whether or not audit committees existed in their institutions, the purpose being to determine the extent of audit committees, the reasons why they have or have not been established, and the advantages and problems encountered with them. One interesting result that arose with implications for accountability and governance was that in universities the stewardship and strategic policy‐making functions are generally separate and that audit committees report only on the former. This is in contrast to the situation in the private sector where both functions are generally combined in the activities of the board of directors. Because there is considerable overlap between the membership of audit committees and the boards of directors, it could be argued that this provides the potential for a greater degree of accountability and governance than currently exists in universities.

Selects two of the recent developments in information technology, and those expected in the near future, which suggest major advances in both human‐computer and computer‐computer communications. Explores the internal control and auditing issues which surround two such technologies – end‐user computing and electronic data interchange (one from each of these categories respectively). Notes the growth of end‐user computing, together with the need to balance control against the trust and creativity which it fosters. This implies the need for a less instrumental and more organizational approach to audit and control. Electronic data interchange provides the opportunity for the further development of paper‐minimal systems and the resulting legal, as well as audit and control, problems are discussed. Concludes by suggesting that there may be a need for a review of audit methodologies which, in principle, remain focused on the large bureaucratic paper‐based systems of the early 1950s.

The recent establishment of the £20 million Teaching and Learning Technology Programme by the Universities' Funding Council in the UK provides one of the largest boosts for IT and education since PLATO (in the USA) and NDPCAL (in the UK). This note describes the BITE project which is part of the above programme and highlights some of the problems that have affected both the development and evaluation of accounting courseware in the past. By using a strong interdisciplinary team of software, educational and subject specialists, the project hopes to overcome some or all of these problems. 1

Considers the impact of EDI on accounting systems, accounting, and on auditing. Indicates that the beneficiaries of EDI are mainly the powerful companies that initiate it, a point sometimes overloooked in the claims made for EDI. Finds that IT and business strategy did not appear to be integrated for these companies although they were able to extend their span of control through inter‐organizational systems beyond their organizational boundaries into areas where they do not need to be providers of capital. In turn this presents them with an additional control risk which needs to be addressed through a stronger managerial or internal audit function.