No abstract

Cytology-based cervical cancer screening programs have been difficult to implement and scale up in developing countries. Thus, the World Health Organization recommends a ‘see and treat’ approach by way of hr-HPV testing and visual inspection. We aimed to evaluate concurrent HPV DNA testing and visual inspection in a real-world low-resource setting by comparing the detection rates of concurrent visual inspection with dilute acetic acid (VIA) or mobile colposcopy and hr-HPV DNA testing to standalone hr-HPV DNA testing (using the careHPV, GeneXpert, AmpFire, or MA-6000 platforms). We further compared their rates of loss to follow-up. This retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional study included all 4482 women subjected to cervical precancer screening at our facility between June 2016 and March 2022. The rates of EVA and VIA ‘positivity’ were 8.6% (95% CI, 6.7–10.6) and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.6–2.5), respectively, while the hr-HPV-positivity rate was 17.9% (95% CI, 16.7–19.0). Overall, 51 women in the entire cohort tested positive on both hr-HPV DNA testing and visual inspection (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.9–1.5), whereas a large majority of the women tested negative (3588/4482, 80.1%) for both and 2.1% (95% CI, 1.7–2.6) tested hr-HPV-negative but visual inspection ‘positive’. In total, 191/275 (69.5%) participants who tested hr-HPV positive on any platform, as a standalone test for screening, returned for at least one follow-up visit. In light of factors such as poor socioeconomic circumstances, additional transportation costs associated with multiple screening visits, and lack of a reliable address system in many parts of Ghana, we posit that standalone HPV DNA testing with recall of hr-HPV positives will be tedious for a national cervical cancer prevention program. Our preliminary data show that concurrent testing (hr-HPV DNA testing alongside visual inspection by way of VIA or mobile colposcopy) may be more cost-effective than recalling hr-HPV-positive women for colposcopy.

Though cervical cancer is largely preventable, success depends on sustained screening and treatment of precancer. This is not available in many low resource settings where screening and treatment services are not available due to a lack of government support. Our vision of setting up a comprehensive cervical cancer prevention scheme across Ghana that offers services tailored to fit every patient's needs, and relies on task shifting has been made possible through the setting up of the Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre (CCPTC) to train and equip middle cadre staff (mostly nurses and midwives) to provide crucial cervical precancer screening and treatment services in many areas of the country that have never seen any such screening activities. To achieve this vision, we have learnt to produce crucial context relevant teaching materials and consumables locally, while adapting simple, readily available social media applications to raise crowd funds to support our work, use these apps to support routine work and to create a network of service providers at various service levels that can rely on each other and assure quality. Our vision has been supported by individuals and organizations that believe in it. They have allowed us to determine our growth and success. By sharing the experiences of the CCPTC we hope to encourage others to set up screening centers in low resource settings.

Introduction:In Ghana, the Papanicolaou (PAP) smear remains central to cervical cancer screening although human papilloma virus testing is recommended. The success of the PAP smear however depends on stringent quality processes. Unfortunately, PAP smear reporting in Ghana is uncoordinated with no clear quality guidelines. Methods:We applied quality guidelines to all PAP smear diagnoses of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) at Catholic Hospital Battor from 1 June 2016 to 31 August 2021. Available slides were independently reviewed by two pathologists, colposcopy findings were correlated with PAP smear results and histology cytology correlation was carried out after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).Results: Of 17 women with HSIL, 3 available slides were reviewed and found to be normal (negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy), obviating the need for LEEP. Of the 11 that had LEEP after colposcopy, cytology histology correlation revealed that 54.6% (6) had no dysplasia, 27.3% (3) were cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II and 18.2% (2) were CIN III. Cytology, colposcopy correlation showed that (out) of the 17 women, 52.9% (9) had no lesions, 29.4% (5) had minor changes and 17.7% (3) had major changes on their cervix. Of the nine that had no lesions on colposcopy, five had LEEP. Of these five, dysplasia (at least CIN II) was revealed in three (60%). Conclusion:The lack of quality processes in PAP smear reporting results in a high false positive rate with overtreatment of patients. Quality measures need to be adopted for the reporting of PAP smears in Ghana if gains are to be made in the fight against cervical cancer.

Objective: To examine the contribution of lower-level health facilities in increasing access to cervical cancer screen-ing in the North Tongu District.Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. The Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre (CCPTC) of the Catholic Hospital, Battor, served as the hub, and six health facilities (3 health centres and 3 CHPS compounds) served as the spokes. From April 2018 to September 2019, the well-resourced CCPTC trained 6 nurses at selected Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) / Health Centres (HCs) (spokes) to provide cer-vical cancer screening services. The nurses, after training, started screening with VIA and HPV DNA testing.Participants: A total of 3,451women were screened by the trained nurses. This comprised 1,935 (56.1%) from the hub and 1,516 (43.9%) from the spokes.Main outcome measure: The detection of screen positives.Results: The screen positives were 19.4% (375/1935) at the hub and 4.9% (74/1516) at the spokes.Conclusion: We have demonstrated that a hub and spokes model for cervical cancer screening is possible in limited resource settings. Designating and resourcing a 'hub' that supports a network of ‘spokes’ could increase women's access to cervical cancer screening. This approach could create awareness about cervical cancer screening services and how they can be accessed.