It is unclear why exactly gliomas show preferential occurrence in certain brain areas. Increased spiking activity around gliomas leads to faster tumour growth in animal models, while higher non-invasively measured brain activity is related to shorter survival in patients. However, it is unknown how regional intrinsic brain activity, as measured in healthy controls, relates to glioma occurrence. We first investigated whether gliomas occur more frequently in regions with intrinsically higher brain activity. Second, we explored whether intrinsic cortical activity at individual patients’ tumour locations relates to tumour and patient characteristics. Across three cross-sectional cohorts, 413 patients were included. Individual tumour masks were created. Intrinsic regional brain activity was assessed through resting-state magnetoencephalography acquired in healthy controls and source-localized to 210 cortical brain regions. Brain activity was operationalized as: (i) broadband power; and (ii) offset of the aperiodic component of the power spectrum, which both reflect neuronal spiking of the underlying neuronal population. We additionally assessed (iii) the slope of the aperiodic component of the power spectrum, which is thought to reflect the neuronal excitation/inhibition ratio. First, correlation coefficients were calculated between group-level regional glioma occurrence, as obtained by concatenating tumour masks across patients, and group-averaged regional intrinsic brain activity. Second, intrinsic brain activity at specific tumour locations was calculated by overlaying patients’ individual tumour masks with regional intrinsic brain activity of the controls and was associated with tumour and patient characteristics. As proposed, glioma preferentially occurred in brain regions characterized by higher intrinsic brain activity in controls as reflected by higher offset. Second, intrinsic brain activity at patients’ individual tumour locations differed according to glioma subtype and performance status: the most malignant isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild-type glioblastoma patients had the lowest excitation/inhibition ratio at their individual tumour locations as compared to isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant, 1p/19q-codeleted glioma patients, while a lower excitation/inhibition ratio related to poorer Karnofsky Performance Status, particularly in codeleted glioma patients. In conclusion, gliomas more frequently occur in cortical brain regions with intrinsically higher activity levels, suggesting that more active regions are more vulnerable to glioma development. Moreover, indices of healthy, intrinsic excitation/inhibition ratio at patients’ individual tumour locations may capture both tumour biology and patients’ performance status. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complex and bidirectional relationship between normal brain functioning and glioma growth, which is at the core of the relatively new field of ‘cancer neuroscience’.
It is unclear why exactly gliomas show preferential occurrence in certain brain areas. Increased spiking activity around gliomas leads to faster tumor growth in animal models, while higher non-invasively measured brain activity is related to shorter survival in patients. However, it is unknown how regional intrinsic brain activity, as measured in healthy controls, relates to glioma occurrence. We first investigated whether gliomas occur more frequently in regions with intrinsically higher brain activity. Secondly, we explored whether intrinsic cortical activity at individual patients tumor locations relates to tumor and patient characteristics. Across three cohorts, 306 patients with different tumor subtypes were included. Tumor masks were created for each patient. Intrinsic regional brain activity was assessed through resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) acquired in healthy controls, which was then source-localized to 210 cortical brain regions according to the Brainnetome atlas. Brain activity was operationalized as (1) broadband power and (2) offset of the aperiodic component of the power spectrum, which both reflect neuronal spiking of the underlying neuronal population. We additionally assessed (3) the slope of the aperiodic component of the power spectrum, which is thought to reflect the neuronal excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance. First, correlation coefficients were calculated between group-level regional glioma occurrence, as obtained by concatenating tumor masks across patients, and group-averaged regional intrinsic brain activity. Second, intrinsic brain activity at specific tumor locations was calculated by overlaying patients individual tumor masks with regional intrinsic brain activity of the controls and was associated with tumor and patient characteristics. As hypothesized, more malignant glioma preferentially occurred in brain regions characterized by higher intrinsic brain activity in controls as reflected by higher offset. Secondly, intrinsic brain activity at patients individual tumor locations differed according to glioma subtype and performance status: the most malignant IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients had the lowest E/I balance at their individual tumor locations, while lower E/I balance weakly related to poorer Karnofsky performance status, independent of glioma subtype. In conclusion, malignant gliomas more frequently occur in cortical brain regions with intrinsically higher activity levels, suggesting that more active regions are more vulnerable to glioma development. Moreover, indices of healthy, intrinsic E/I balance at patients individual tumor locations may capture both tumor biology and patients performance status. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complex and bidirectional relationship between normal brain functioning and glioma growth, which is at the core of the relatively new field of cancer neuroscience.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.