Dexniguldipine-HCl is a new dihydropyridine compound that exerts selective antiproliferative activity in a variety of tumor models and, in addition, has a high potency in overcoming multidrug resistance. The purpose of this trial was to determine the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of dexniguldipine and to establish a recommended dose for phase II trials. A total of 37 patients with cancer were treated with oral dexniguldipine in increasing doses for up to 7 days. The main parameters evaluated were subjective tolerance and laboratory and cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and ECG). Blood samples were drawn for analysis of the drug's pharmacokinetics. Dizziness and nausea were the major adverse events observed in seven patients, but episodes were generally mild and not clearly dose-related. Vomiting occurred in one patient. Hypotensive effects and orthostatic dysregulation were observed in some patients but were not considered to be dose-limiting. Therefore, no dose-limiting toxicity was found and the maximally tolerable dose could not be determined. Pharmacokinetic data showed wide interindividual variation and a dose-dependent increase in steady-state serum concentrations at doses of up to 1,000 mg daily, with no clear further increase being observed at higher doses. Consistently high concentrations were achieved with the 2,500-mg dose. Despite the lack of dose-limiting toxicity, higher doses of dexniguldipine do not appear to be useful for clinical evaluation because of the pharmacokinetic properties of the compound: therefore, 2,500 mg/day is recommended as the daily dose for phase II trials.

No abstract

No abstract

A randomized inter-group trial comparing more intensive treatment strategies to a common standard arm 3 + 7 (CSA) was conducted in patients with non-M3 AML. Untreated patients ≥ 60 years were allocated to the CSA (n = 132) or to the study group arms (n = 1154) of the AMLCG (TAD/HAM versus HAM/HAM ± G-CSF followed by TAD and maintenance) and the OSHO (intermediate-dose ara-C/mitoxantrone followed by ara-C/mitoxantrone). Median age of the 1147 eligible patients was 69 (range 60–87) years. CR/CRi status at 90 days was not significantly different between the CSA (54% (95%CI: 45–64)) and the study group arms (53% (95%CI: 47–60) and 59% (95%CI: 58–63)). The five-year event-free survival (EFS) probability (primary endpoint) was 6.2% (95%CI: 2.7–14.0) in the CSA, 7.6% (95%CI: 4.5–12.8) in study group A and 11.1% (95%CI: 9.0–13.7) in B. The 5-year OS was 17.2% (95%CI: 11.0–26.9), 17.0% (95%CI: 2.0–23.9), and 19.5% (95%CI: 16.7–22.8) in CSA, study group A and B, respectively. Neither study group differed significantly from the CSA regarding EFS, OS, or relapse-free survival. In multivariate analyses, allocation to the treatment strategy was not significantly associated with the time-to-event endpoints. The evaluation of more intensive treatment strategies did not show clinically relevant outcome differences when compared to CSA.