Despite continued improvement in the methods and devices used to treat intertrochanteric fractures, there remains an unacceptable amount of failures. The cut-out rate for hip screws has been recorded up to 8.3%. To evaluate the migration of different implants under physiological loads, a multiplanar biomechanical test method for hip screws was developed, the first to incorporate a simulation of the human gait cycle by an oscillating flexion/extension movement of the test device. The new method was used to compare different hip screw and blade designs with respect to their directional migration resistance. The test method generated failure modes that were consistent with those observed clinically. Under cyclic loading, the hip screws migrated predominantly in a cephalad direction. In contrast, the helical blades exhibited a distinct migration in their axial direction. The Gamma3 hip screw design showed a significantly higher migration resistance compared with other screw and helical blade designs. The results demonstrate the ability of hip screws to significantly reduce axial migration and prevent cut-out under simulated walking loads. Further, the new multiplanar test method creates a physiological environment that can be used to optimize designs for intertrochanteric fracture fixation. ß

The number of ankle fractures in elderly patients is increasing. The aim of treatment of ankle fractures in the elderly is to guarantee a possible unlimited autonomy and quality of life for patients. This is achieved by minimization of the complications and impairments after ankle joint fractures. Decisive for the further course is the initial treatment. The results are essentially determined by the soft tissue management, reduction and stable osteosynthesis; however, an orthogeriatric co-management with the implementation of treatment paths and standard operating procedures is recommended. The advantages of an interdisciplinary cooperation of trauma surgeons and geriatricians are obvious in this situation.

Objective: To compare the effects of anti-gravity treadmill rehabilitation with those of standard rehabilitation on surgically treated ankle and tibial plateau fractures. Design: Open-label prospective randomized multicenter study. Setting: Three level 1 trauma centers. Subjects: Patients with tibial plateau or ankle fractures who underwent postoperative partial weight-bearing were randomized into the intervention (anti-gravity treadmill use) or control (standard rehabilitation protocol) groups. Main measures: The primary endpoint was the change in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for ankle fractures and total Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for tibial plateau fractures (0–100 points) from baseline (T1) to six weeks after operation (T4) in both groups. Leg circumference of both legs was measured to assess thigh muscle atrophy in the operated leg. Results: Thirty-seven patients constituted the intervention and 36 the control group, respectively; 14 patients dropped out during the follow-up period. Among the 59 remaining patients (mean age 42 [range, 19–65] years), no difference was noted in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (54.2 ± 16.1 vs. 56.0 ± 16.6) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (52.8 ± 18.3 vs 47.6 ± 17.7) between the intervention and control groups 6 weeks after operation. The change in the leg circumference from T1 to T4 was greater by 4.6 cm in the intervention group (95% confidence interval: 1.2–8.0, P = 0.005). No adverse event associated with anti-gravity treadmill rehabilitation was observed. Conclusion: No significant difference was noted in patient-reported outcomes between the two groups. Significant differences in muscular atrophy of the thigh were observed six weeks after operation.

No abstract

Objective: To compare the one-year postoperative outcomes of anti-gravity treadmill rehabilitation with those of standard rehabilitation in patients with ankle or tibial plateau fractures. Design: An open-label prospective randomised study. Setting: Three trauma centres. Subjects: Patients were randomised into the intervention (anti-gravity treadmill) or control (standard protocol) rehabilitation group. Main measures: The primary endpoint was changes in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for ankle fractures and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for tibial plateau fractures from baseline to 12 months after operation. Secondary endpoints were the subscores of these scores, muscle atrophy (leg circumference at 20 cm above and 10 cm below the knee joint) and the Dynamic Gait Index. Results: Initially, 73 patients (37 vs 36) underwent randomisation. After 12 months, 29 patients in the intervention group and 24 patients in the control group could be analysed. No significant difference was noted in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (80.8 ± 18.4 and 78.4 ± 21.1) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (84.8 ± 15.2 and 81.7 ± 17.0). The change in the Dynamic Gait Index from 12 weeks to 12 months differed significantly between the groups ( P = 0.04). Patients with tibial plateau fractures had a 3 cm wider thigh circumference in the intervention group than those in the control group (95% confidence interval: −0.2 to 6.3 cm, P = 0.08). Conclusion: One year after surgery, patients who had undergone anti-gravity treadmill rehabilitation showed better gait than patients in the control group, and those with tibial plateau fractures had less muscle atrophy.