Since 18 December 2004, the PARASOL satellite is a member of the so-called A-train atmospheric orbital observatory, flying together with Aqua, Aura, CALIPSO, CLOUDSAT, and OCO satellites. These satellites combine for the first time a full suite of instruments for observing aerosols and clouds, using passive radiometer complementarily with active lidar and radar sounders. The PARASOL payload is extensively derived from the instrument developed for the POLDER programs that performs measurements of bidirectionality and polarization for a very wide field-of-view and for a visible͞near-infrared spectral range. An overview of the results obtained during the commissioning phase and the reevaluation after one year in orbit is presented. In-flight calibration methods are briefly described, and radiometric and geometric performances are both evaluated. All algorithms are based on a panel of methods using mainly natural targets previously developed for POLDER missions and adapted or redeveloped in the PARASOL context. Regarding performances, all mission requirements are met except for band 443 (not recommended for use). After one year in orbit, a perfect geometrical stability was found while a slight decrease of the radiometric sensitivity was observed and corrected through an innovative multitemporal algorithm based on observations of bright and scattered convective clouds. The scientific exploitation of PARASOL has now begun, particularly by coupling these specific observations with other A-train sensor measurements.

Radiometric cross calibration of Earth observation sensors is a crucial need to guarantee or quantify the consistency of measurements from different sensors. Twenty desert sites, historically selected, are revisited, and their radiometric profiles are described for the visible to the near-infrared spectral domain. Therefore, acquisitions by various sensors over these desert sites are collected into a dedicated database, Structure d'Accueil des Données d'Etalonnage, defined to manage operational calibrations and the required SI traceability. The cross-calibration method over desert sites is detailed. Surface reflectances are derived from measurements by a reference sensor and spectrally interpolated to derive the surface and then top-of-atmosphere reflectances for spectral bands of the sensor to calibrate. The comparison with reflectances really measured provides an estimation of the cross calibration between the two sensors. Results illustrate the efficiency of the method for various pairs of sensors among AQUA-Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Environmental Satellite-Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS), Polarization and Anisotropy of Reflectance for Atmospheric Sciences Couples With Observations From a Lidar (PARASOL)-Polarization and Directionality of the Earth Reflectances (POLDER), and Satellite pour l'Observation de la Terre 5 (SPOT5)-VEGETATION. MERIS and MODIS cali-brations are found to be very consistent, with a discrepancy of 1%, which is close to the accuracy of the method. A larger bias of 3% was identified between VEGETATION-PARASOL on one hand and MERIS-MODIS on the other hand. A good consistency was found between sites, with a standard deviation of 2% for red to near-infrared bands, increasing to 4% and 6% for green and blue bands, respectively. The accuracy of the method, which is close to 1%, may also depend on the spectral bands of both sensor to calibrate and reference sensor (up to 5% in the worst case) and their corresponding geometrical matching.

Reflected skylight in above-water measurements of diffuse marine reflectance can be reduced substantially by viewing the surface through an analyzer transmitting the vertically polarized component of incident radiance. For maximum reduction of effects, radiometric measurements should be made at a viewing zenith angle of approximately 45 degrees (near the Brewster angle) and a relative azimuth angle between solar and viewing directions greater than 90 degrees (backscattering), preferably 135 degrees. In this case the residual reflected skylight in the polarized signal exhibits minimum sensitivity to the sea state and can be corrected to within a few 10(-4) in reflectance units. For most oceanic waters the resulting relative error on the diffuse marine reflectance in the blue and green is less than 1%. Since the water body polarizes incident skylight, the measured polarized reflectance differs from the total reflectance. The difference, however, is small for the considered geometry. Measurements made at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography pier in La Jolla, Calif., with a specifically designed scanning polarization radiometer, confirm the theoretical findings and demonstrate the usefulness of polarization radiometry for measuring diffuse marine reflectance.