This study predicts the burden of incident osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in the United States, by sex, age group, race/ethnicity, and fracture type, from 2005 to 2025. Total fractures were >2 million, costing nearly $17 billion in 2005. Men account for >25% of the burden. Rapid growth in the disease burden is projected among nonwhite populations. Introduction:The aging of the U.S. population will likely lead to greater prevalence of osteoporosis. Policy makers require precise projections of the disease burden by demographic subgroups and skeletal sites to effectively target osteoporosis intervention and treatment programs. Materials and Methods: A state transition Markov decision model was used to estimate total incident fractures and costs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and skeletal site for the U.S. population ജ50 years of age for 2005-2025. Results: More than 2 million incident fractures at a cost of $17 billion are predicted for 2005. Total costs including prevalent fractures are more than $19 billion. Men account for 29% of fractures and 25% of costs. Total incident fractures by skeletal site were vertebral (27%), wrist (19%), hip (14%), pelvic (7%), and other (33%). Total costs by fracture type were vertebral (6%), hip (72%), wrist (3%), pelvic (5%), and other (14%). By 2025, annual fractures and costs are projected to rise by almost 50%. The most rapid growth is estimated for people 65-74 years of age, with an increase >87%. An increase of nearly 175% is projected for Hispanic and other subpopulations. Conclusions: Osteoporosis prevention, treatment, and education efforts should address all skeletal sites, not just hip and vertebral, and appropriate attention is warranted for men and diverse race/ethnicity subgroups.

Recent evidence suggests that vitamin D intakes above current recommendations may be associated with better health outcomes. However, optimal serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] have not been defined. This review summarizes evidence from studies that evaluated thresholds for serum 25(OH)D concentrations in relation to bone mineral density (BMD), lower-extremity function, dental health, and risk of falls, fractures, and colorectal cancer. For all endpoints, the most advantageous serum concentrations of 25(OH)D begin at 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL), and the best are between 90 and 100 nmol/L (36-40 ng/mL). In most persons, these concentrations could not be reached with the currently recommended intakes of 200 and 600 IU vitamin D/d for younger and older adults, respectively. A comparison of vitamin D intakes with achieved serum concentrations of 25(OH)D for the purpose of estimating optimal intakes led us to suggest that, for bone health in younger adults and all studied outcomes in older adults, an increase in the currently recommended intake of vitamin D is warranted. An intake for all adults of > or =1000 IU (25 microg) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] vitamin D (cholecalciferol)/d is needed to bring vitamin D concentrations in no less than 50% of the population up to 75 nmol/L. The implications of higher doses for the entire adult population should be addressed in future studies.

Context: Altered vitamin D and calcium homeostasis may play a role in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 DM).Evidence Acquisition and Analyses: MEDLINE review was conducted through January 2007 for observational studies and clinical trials in adults with outcomes related to glucose homeostasis. When data were available to combine, meta-analyses were performed, and summary odds ratios (OR) are presented. is increasing at an alarming rate both nationally and worldwide, with more than 1 million new cases per year diagnosed in the United States alone (1). Diabetes is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States, and it is also a major cause of significant morbidity. Although our current methods of treating type 2 DM and its complications have improved, prevention of the disease is preferable. Indeed, epidemiological data suggest that nine of 10 cases of type 2 DM could be attributed to habits and forms of modifiable behavior (2). Potentially modifiable environmental risk factors for type 2 DM have been identified, the major one being obesity. Although weight loss (achieved by any means) has been shown to be successful in delaying type 2 DM, it is difficult to achieve and maintain long term. Therefore, identification of environmental and easily modified risk factors is urgently needed to prevent development of type 2 DM in the 41 million Americans who are at risk of the disease (3).The major and most well-known function of vitamin D is to maintain calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and promote bone mineralization. However, recent evidence suggests that vitamin D and calcium homeostasis may also be important for a variety of nonskeletal outcomes including neuromuscular function and falls, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, and colorectal and prostate cancer (4, 5). Based on basic and animal studies, vitamin D and calcium have also been suspected as modifiers of diabetes risk. Vitamin D insufficiency has long been suspected as a risk factor for type 1 diabetes based on animal and human observational studies (6). More recently, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that altered vitamin D and calcium homeostasis may also play a role in the development of type 2 DM. The purpose of our systematic review was to examine: 1) the association between vitamin D and calcium status and risk of type 2 DM; and 2) the effect of vitamin D and/or calcium supplementation on glucose metabolism. Materials and MethodsWe searched MEDLINE for English-language literature through January 2007 for observational studies on the association between vitamin D/calcium status (defined by serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentration, and vitamin D, calcium, or dairy intake) and type 2 DM (prevalence or incidence) and for randomized controlled trials of the effect of vitamin D and/or calcium supplementation in nonpregnant adults on outcomes related to glucose homeostasis. We also examined metabolic syndrome (prevalence or incidence) as an outcome of interest, given that insulin resistance, a feature of type 2 DM, is consid...