BackgroundWe retrospectively report treatment results of our single-centre experience with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hfSRT) of limited brain metastases in primary and recurrence disease situations. Our aim was to find the most effective and safe dose concept.MethodsFrom 04/2006 to 12/2010, 75 patients, with 108 intracranial metastases, were treated with hfSRT. 52 newly diagnosed metastases (48%), without up-front whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), received hfSRT as a primary treatment. 56 metastases (52%) received a prior WBRT and were treated in this study in a recurrence situation. Main fractionation concepts used for primary hfSRT were 6-7x5 Gy (61.5%) and 5x6 Gy (19.2%), for recurrent hfSRT 7-10x4 Gy (33.9%) and 5-6x5 Gy (33.9%).ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) of all patients summed up to 9.1 months, actuarial 6-and 12-month-OS was 59% and 35%, respectively. Median local brain control (LC) was 11.9 months, median distant brain control (DC) 3.9 months and intracranial control (IC) 3.4 months, respectively. Variables with significant influence on OS were Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) (p = 0.019), the biological eqivalent dose (calculated on a 2 Gy single dose, EQD2, α/β = 10) < and ≥ median of 39 Gy (p = 0.012), extracerebral activity of the primary tumour (p < 0.001) and the steroid uptake during hfSRT (p = 0.03). LC was significantly influenced by the EQD2, ≤ and > 35 Gy (p = 0.004) in both uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Median LC was 14.9 months for EQD2 >35 Gy and 3.4 months for doses ≤35 Gy, respectively. Early treatment related side effects were usually mild. Nevertheless, patients with a EQD2 >35 Gy had higher rates of toxicity (31%) than ≤35 Gy (8.3%, p=0.026).ConclusionComparing different dose concepts in hfSRT, a cumulative EQD2 of ≥35 Gy seems to be the most effective concept in patients with primary or recurrent limited brain metastases. Despite higher rates of only mild toxicity, this concept represents a safe treatment option.

There is no standard treatment available for recurrent high-grade gliomas. This monoinstitutional retrospective analysis evaluates the differences in overall survival and progression-free survival in patients according to the timing of re-irradiation. Patients suffering from a glioblastoma who received re-irradiation for recurrence were evaluated retrospectively. The median overall survival (OS) and the median progression-free survival were compared with different treatment options and within various time periods. From January 2007 until March 2015, 41 patients suffering from recurrent high-grade gliomas received re-irradiation [median dose of 30.6 Gy (range 20-40 Gy) in median 4 Gy fractions (range 1.8-5 Gy)] in our institution after initial postoperative irradiation or combined radiochemotherapy. The OS in this population was 34 months, and the OS after recurrence (OS-R) was 13 months. After diagnosis of recurrence, patients underwent additional surgical resection after a median of 1.2 months, received a second-line systemic therapy after 2.2 months with or without re-irradiation after 5.7 months. Growth of the tumour was assessed 4.3 months after the start of re-irradiation. The OS after the second surgical resection was 12.2 months, 11.7 months after the start of the second-line systemic therapy, and 6.7 months after the start of re-irradiation. The OS-R was not significantly correlated with the start of re-irradiation after a diagnosis of recurrence or the time period after the previous surgery. At this institution, re-irradiation was performed later compared to other treatment options. However, select patients could benefit from irradiation at an earlier time point. A precise time point should still be evaluated on an individual basis due to the patient's diverse conditions.

Background: Patients with cancer receiving oncological treatment often suffer from a reduced quality of life (QoL) and resilience. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an interdisciplinary integrative oncology group-based program on resilience and quality of life in patients with cancer during or after conventional oncological therapy. Methods: This prospective longitudinal single-center study evaluated the resilience (Resilience Scale), quality of life (EORTC-QLQ C30), anxiety, depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and distress levels (Distress Thermometer) of 60 patients with cancer who participated in a 10-week interdisciplinary integrative oncology group-based program during or after cancer treatment in outpatient clinics. An average of 12 (range 11-13) patients participated in each 10-week group. The program included recommendations for diet, stress management, relaxation, and exercise, as well as naturopathic self-help strategies and psychosocial support. Results: There were slight increases in global quality of life scores (week 0: 58.05 ± 20.05 vs week 10: 63.13 ± 18.51, n = 59, P = .063, d = −.25) and resilience scores (week 0: 63.50 ± 13.14 vs week 10: 66.15 ± 10.17, n = 52, P = .222, d = −.17) after the group program compared to before; however, these changes were not statistically significant and had small effect sizes. Patients with at least moderate anxiety symptoms ( P = .022, d = .42) and low resilience ( P = .006, d = −.54) benefited most from the program. The patients reported no relevant side effects or adverse events from the program. Conclusions: No significant effects on global quality of life or resilience were found in the general sample; notably, patients with anxiety and low initial resilience benefited the most from the program.

ZusammenfassungDas Klaus-Bahlsen-Zentrum für Integrative Onkologie (KBZ) ist organisatorisch dem Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover (MHH) zugeordnet. Durch die finanzielle Unterstützung der Rut- und Klaus-Bahlsen-Stiftung (RKBS) konnte das Zentrum initiiert und innerhalb der MHH ausgebaut werden. Die bisherigen Einzelprojekte in der onkologischen Komplementärmedizin, die naturheilkundliche Beratung, Gruppenangebote sowie pflegerische Anwendungen wurden im Zentrum zusammengeführt und durch weitere Angebote und Forschungsthemen in der Psychoonkologie, Rehabilitation, Sportmedizin, Ernährungsmedizin und Pflegeforschung ergänzt. Mittlerweile sind im KBZ zwölf Mitarbeitende verschiedener Professionen tätig, die die Patient*innen leitlinienorientiert beraten und mit wissenschaftlich anerkannten Methoden behandeln. Das KBZ stärkt so mit seinen Angeboten und Aktivitäten die ganzheitliche Behandlung von Krebspatient*innen.