Background: Prevalence studies are important to determine the oral health status and treatment needs of elderly people. Our aim was to obtain data for the prevalence of oral mucosal conditions (OMC) in a Turkish elderly sample and to compare our results with different geographic regions. Objective: The purpose of this clinical-based study was to determine the prevalence of OMC and associated risk factors in a clinical-based Turkish elderly sample. Methods: The study sample consisted of 700 patients >60 years old. The clinical examination of patients was performed by both authors. All participants were questioned about their general health status, medication use, oral hygiene habits, tobacco or alcohol use, use of dentures, and the length of denture use. χ2 Pearson’s test with Fisher’s exact probability test was used to analyze the data. Logistic regression models were used to assess the influence of independent variables; odds ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05. Results: OMC were recorded in 40.7% of the study sample. The logistic regression model revealed that male gender, length of denture use, smoking habit, and being a former smoker increased the probability of having an OMC. Smoking habit also increased the risk of having leukoplakia. The denture-related lesions accounted for 36.4% with the length of denture use and diabetes mellitus being significant risk factors for denture stomatitis and denture hyperplasia. The model for traumatic ulcer included medication use as a significant risk factor. Conclusions: Our results regarding an elderly Turkish sample support the studies of other populations where the prevalence of OMC was related to length of denture use, smoking, and gender. We also observed some important associations between denture-related lesions, systemic diseases, and medication use which require further investigation.
The objective of this work is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA)/platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combination with PRP alone for the treatment of infrabony defects 18 months after surgery and to examine the influence of radiographic defect angle on the clinical and radiographic outcomes. Twenty-eight infrabony defects were treated with DFDBA/PRP combination or PRP alone. Clinical parameters and radiographic measurements were compared at baseline and 18 months. Interquartile range was performed to classify the defect angles. Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon test, and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data. The DFDBA/PRP combination exhibited more favorable gains in both clinical and radiographic parameters than PRP alone group (p < 0.05). A correlation existed between defect angle, defect depth, and clinical/radiographic outcomes for the defects treated with DFDBA/PRP. The narrow defects presented more favorable clinical attachment level values (CAL) gain, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction and defect resolution than wide defects in the combination group (p < 0.05). The influence of baseline defect angle was not significant in the PRP-alone group (p > 0.05). The results indicate that DFDBA/PRP combination is more effective than PRP alone for the treatment of infrabony defects, and the amount of CAL gain, PPD reduction, and bone fill increases when the infrabony defect is narrow and deep before DFDBA/PRP combination treatment.
This report describes a case of immediate hypersensitivity reaction associated with the mercury component of amalgam restorations. The release of mercury induced an acute reaction which resulted in erythematous lesions, severe burning and itchy sensation and diffi culty in breathing. Skin patch test results indicated a very strong positive reaction to mercury. Amalgam restorations were replaced with composite fi lling material. The patient, her family and her dental practitioner were strictly advised to use alternative restorative materials in case of a need for restoration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.