Plasma morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) concentrations were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 36 hospice inpatients receiving morphine orally or subcutaneously. The data were analyzed in relation to dose, serum creatinine, serum gamma glutamyl transferase, and presence or absence of opioid-induced adverse effects. There were significant associations (P < 0.05) between plasma morphine, M3G (subcutaneous route only), and M6G concentrations and dose for both routes of administration. The mean dose-corrected plasma morphine concentration for the subcutaneous group was three times that of the oral group, confirming present oral to subcutaneous dose conversion practices. Nineteen patients experienced symptoms attributed to morphine: nausea and vomiting in ten and acute delirium in nine. Serum creatinine was elevated in patients with adverse effects (P = 0.031), as were the dose-corrected plasma M3G (P = 0.029) and M6G (P = 0.043) concentrations. All seven patients with serum creatinine concentrations above the normal range had symptoms attributed to opioid-induced adverse effects. Plasma M3G, M6G, and dose-corrected plasma M3G and M6G concentrations were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in these patients than in those with normal serum creatinine concentrations. The data indicate that accumulation of M3G and M6G may be a causal or aggravating factor in the nausea and vomiting and cognitive function profile of palliative and terminal care patients with significant renal function impairment.

A mechanistic approach to advanced cancer pain management is proposed, based on the clinically perceived anatomical and pathophysiological mechanisms of pain generation. It is an extension of the World Health Organisation (WHO) analgesic ladder in which severity of pain is the principal determinant of analgesic choice. The mechanistic categories are: superficial somatic, deep somatic, visceral and neurogenic (mixed or pure, i.e., nociceptive component present or absent). Allocation of pain to the different categories is based on clinical history, physical findings and investigations to establish the site and extent of active primary or metastatic tumor deposits, and evidence of previous response to medication. Drug choice sequence is determined by the dominant pain mechanism judged to be present and not the severity of the pain. In order to describe this approach, mechanisms of pain, disease distribution and drug treatment have been analysed in the first 20 consecutive patients who consented to enter a longitudinal pain description and evaluation study on admission to an inpatient hospice unit. Despite a high exclusion rate from research standard monitoring due to severity of illness and related factors, the majority of eligible patients approached to enter the study did so, and the pain scoring was well tolerated. The implications of this for future research and clinical practice are discussed. In 6 patients only 1 pain mechanism was identified (visceral 4, deep somatic 2). Two mechanisms were present in 8 patients and 3 mechanisms in 6 patients. The deep somatic mechanism was identified in 15 patients, visceral mechanism in 13, neurogenic in 10 and superficial somatic in 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Eighteen inpatients receiving morphine for cancer pain in a palliative care unit were recruited to a study employing a range of neuropsychological tests to assess cognitive function. The tests employed were National Adult Reading Test, Williams Delayed Recall Test, Immediate Memory for Digits, Trailing Making Test, and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. These data were correlated with biochemical tests of renal and hepatic function, morphine dose, route of administration, plasma morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) concentrations. Despite having no clinical evidence of impairment of cognitive function, the level of current intellectual functioning (Symbol Digit Substitution Test) was on average two standard deviations below normal. Immediate memory appeared to be well preserved, but Delayed Recall and Trailing Making Test scores were significantly above normal. There was no significant correlation between morphine dose, or plasma morphine and M3G and M6G concentrations, and the neuropsychological test results, although a weak correlation was found between plasma morphine concentration and digits forward (r = -0.47, p < 0.05) and Digit Symbol Substitution scores (r = -0.46, p < 0.05). Seven patients had some degree of nausea or vomiting, ascribed as an opioid adverse effect, and had higher serum creatinine concentrations, worse neuropsychological performance, and significantly higher plasma M3G concentrations (p < 0.05). These data provide some evidence to suggest that cognitive functioning in patients with advanced cancer receiving morphine may be significantly impaired despite apparent clinical normality. From these data it is not possible to determine what relative causal contribution the disease and the drug made to these observations, although renal function, plasma morphine, and M3G concentrations may be important. Future research should address a broad range of neuropsychological testing to assist in the modification of practices aimed at enhancement of quality of life, such as opioid substitution or rotation.