Working memory (WM) capacity has been shown to influence how read- ers make decisions about syntactic ambiguity. In the present study, the authors conducted a conceptual replication of Swets et al. (2007) across three differ- ent language samples (L1 English monolinguals, L1-L2 Spanish-English bilin- guals, and L1-L2 Mandarin-English bilinguals) to assess the effects of working memory and language proficiency on L1 relative clause attachment decisions. Consistent with the 2007 results, structural equation modeling (SEM) analyses demonstrated that low WM span is associated with a preference to attach am- biguous RCs higher in the syntactic structure, contrary to a recency strategy. Analyses also demonstrate that proficiency in L1 and L2 have no effect, suggest- ing that relative clause attachment preferences primarily reflect the properties of the language and the working memory capacity of the comprehender.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.