BackgroundTo promote rational prescribing and appropriate use of drugs, it is important to evaluate the prescription pattern using the World Health Organization (WHO) drug use indicators. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prescription patterns and rational prescribing at the private community pharmacies of Biratnagar, Eastern Nepal, using some of the WHO core drug use indicators. Material and MethodsFive private community pharmacies were selected using systemic random sampling. Nine hundred patient encounters from these pharmacies were assessed prospectively for four months from September 2015-December 2015. Data was collected from each patient encounter and were recorded directly into a prescription indicator form. Results Average number of drugs prescribed per encounter was 2.14 (n=1930). Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name and from essential drug list was 45.18% (n=872) and 76.11% (n=1469) respectively. Percentage of encounters in which antibiotic and injection was prescribed were 40.44% (n=364) and 3.44% (n=31) respectively. Conclusion Prescribing practices in Eastern Nepal are not up to the standards recommended by WHO. Drug use evaluation can help to ensure whether the antibiotics are appropriately prescribed or not. Poly-pharmacy, excessive use of antibiotics was quite common and concept of generic prescribing and National Essential Medicine List (NEML) was not appreciable. Standard guidelines should be recommended and strictly followed by the prescribers and National Formulary and NEML should be made available in every health institution. Physicians should be emphasized to prescribe medicines from NEML.

Introduction: To ensure safe, effective and rational prescribing by tomorrow’s doctors it is important to assess the prescribing skills of today’s medical students. The aim of this study was to assess the prescribing skills of MBBS preclinical students of a Teaching Hospital.Methods: First and second year medical students were given different sets of common clinical scenarios and asked to write a prescription for these. The physician and drug related components were analyzed following the WHO guidelines. The data were statistically analyzed using Chi-square test for 99% and 99.99% Confidence Intervals. P values < 0.01 and < 0.0001 were considered significant respectively. Results: MBBS first year student scored 123 (82%) and 94 (62.66%) in physician and drug related component respectively. MBBS second year students scored 139 (92.66%) and 111 (73.33%) in physician and drug related components respectively. Results obtained from the element prescriber's address and telephone number, date of prescription and patient’s address on the prescription of first year and second year medical students were highly significant (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Prescribing skill of first and second year MBBS students is not satisfactory. Prescribing deficiencies were found on both the physician and drug related components which emphasizes the need of adequate prescribing knowledge in order to minimize the prescription errors and irrational prescribing. Based on this study, we suggest all the undergraduate medical students should be regularly trained and evaluated to further help minimize the prescribing errors.Keywords: prescription; prescription errors; prescribing skill. | PubMed