We study the cake-cutting problem where agents have single-peaked preferences over the cake. We show that a recently proposed mechanism by Wang and Wu (2019) to obtain envy-free allocations can yield large welfare losses. Using a simplifying assumption, we characterize all Pareto optimal allocations, which have a simple structure: are peak-preserving and non-wasteful. Finally, we provide simple alternative mechanisms that Pareto dominate that of Wang-Wu and achieve envy-freeness or Pareto optimality.
The standard economic model of choice assumes that a decision maker chooses from sets of alternatives. A new branch of literature has considered the problem of choosing from lists i.e. ordered sets. In this paper, we propose a new framework that considers choice from infinite sequences. Our framework provides a natural way to model decision making in settings where choice relies on a string of recommendations. We introduce three broad classes of choice rules in this framework. Our main result shows that bounded attention is due to the continuity of the choice functions with respect to a natural topology. We introduce some natural choice rules in this framework and provide their axiomatic characterizations. Finally, we introduce the notion of computability of a choice function using Turing machines and show that computable choice rules can be implemented by a finite automaton.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.