Background: Paracervical infiltration is used in vaginal hysterectomy to facilitate dissection. Use of paracervical infiltration however can be associated with local ischemia and infection. We did a study to find out its benefits during vaginal hysterectomy.Methods: It was a prospective case control study. Patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, no paracervical infiltration was given. In the second group paracervical infiltration was given before hysterectomy. The operating time, blood loss and postoperative infection were noted in each group.Results: The operating time was slightly higher in vaginal hysterectomy group without infiltration (p=0.025) The operating time in laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy group was not significant (p=0.0296). There was significant difference in Hemoglobin after surgery in both groups (p value 0.614 for vaginal hysterectomy and 0.173 for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy). There was no case of infection in both groups.Conclusions: From our study, we concluded that paracervical infiltration offers no distinctive advantage during vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.