Forage cover crops are gaining in popularity on the Canadian prairies, where multi-species crop mixtures are grown for soil and ecosystem enhancing benefits, but also harvested for forage. As the use of these forage mixtures increases, more knowledge is needed to understand the impact these mixtures have on forage production systems. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of increasing plant species diversity on forage productivity, soil chemistry, and soil microbial communities. Field trials were conducted in 2016 and 2017 at two separate locations in the Canadian Prairie region that included four treatments: (1) oat monoculture, (2) three spp. mixture (one grass, one legume, one brassica), (3) six spp. mixture (two grasses, two legumes, two brassicas), and (4) nine spp. mixture (three grasses, three legumes, three brassicas). Soil and plant samples were collected at the mid and late growing season to assess soil chemistry, plant biomass and composition, forage nutrition and quality, and soil bacterial and fungal communities. Overall, the oat monoculture had the highest biomass productivity, while the nine spp. mixture produced the lowest biomass among the treatments. All three mixtures had a better nutritional profile [i.e., greater concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), total phosphorus (TP) and total potassium (TK), and lower concentrations of acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF)] compared to the monoculture. Differences in forage nutrition were particularly heightened at the end of the growing season. Soil chemical properties did not differ greatly among the treatments with the exception of higher levels of soil nitrate availability in the mixtures compared to the monoculture. Early indicators of a shift in soil microbial diversity and fungal community composition, and an increased abundance of fungal pathotrophs in the mixtures compared to the oat monoculture, was observed at one of the field sites. This study indicates that increasing plant species diversity does not always lead to an increase in biomass production or significant changes or improvements in soil microbial communities. However, the inclusion of multiple plant species can improve the quality and nutritive value of forages over a monoculture forage crop.
Including pulse crops in cereal-based cropping systems has become a widely accepted and useful agronomic practice to increase crop diversification and biologically fixed nitrogen in agroecosystems. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding how the intensification of pulses in crop rotations influence soil microbial communities. In this study, we used an amplicon sequencing approach to examine the bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial and fungal communities from the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phase (final year of 4 years rotations) of a long-term pulse intensification field trial in the semi-arid region of the Canadian Prairies. Our results revealed pulse frequency had a minimal impact on microbial α-diversity, but caused a significant shift in the composition of the fungal (rhizosphere and bulk soil) and bacterial (bulk soil) communities. This effect was the most pronounced in the Ascomycete and Bacteroidete communities. Increasing pulse frequency also promoted a higher proportion of fungal pathotrophs in the bulk soil, particularly those putatively identified as plant pathogens. The network analysis revealed that rotations with higher pulse frequency promoted increased competition within the soil microbial networks in the rhizosphere and bulk soil. However, we also detected more negative interactions among the dominant pathotrophic taxa with increased pulse frequency, suggesting higher soil-borne disease potential. These findings highlight the potential drawbacks and reduced sustainability of increasing pulse frequency in crop rotations in semiarid environments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.