A critical challenge in electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction to renewable fuels is product selectivity. Desirable products of CO 2 reduction require proton equivalents, but key catalytic intermediates can also be competent for direct proton reduction to H 2 . Understanding how to manage divergent reaction pathways at these shared intermediates is essential to achieving high selectivity. Both proton reduction to hydrogen and CO 2 reduction to formate generally proceed through a metal hydride intermediate. We apply thermodynamic relationships that describe the reactivity of metal hydrides with H + and CO 2 to generate a thermodynamic product diagram, which outlines the free energy of product formation as a function of proton activity and hydricity (ΔG H− ), or hydride donor strength. The diagram outlines a region of metal hydricity and proton activity in which CO 2 reduction is favorable and H + reduction is suppressed. We apply our diagram to inform our selection of [Pt(dmpe) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2 as a potential catalyst, because the corresponding hydride [HPt(dmpe) 2 ] + has the correct hydricity to access the region where selective CO 2 reduction is possible. We validate our choice experimentally; [Pt(dmpe) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2 is a highly selective electrocatalyst for CO 2 reduction to formate (>90% Faradaic efficiency) at an overpotential of less than 100 mV in acetonitrile with no evidence of catalyst degradation after electrolysis. Our report of a selective catalyst for CO 2 reduction illustrates how our thermodynamic diagrams can guide selective and efficient catalyst discovery. electrocatalysis | CO 2 reduction | solar fuel | formate production | hydride T he emerging availability of inexpensive renewable electricity has motivated interest in using electrolytic methods to generate sustainable fuels. Electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction provides an entry to carbon-neutral fuels, but product selectivity remains a significant challenge (1, 2). Nearly all reductive reactions of interest involve protons as well as electrons, introducing the complication of direct proton reduction to H 2 under electrolytic conditions. Diversion of electron equivalents into proton reduction results in lower Faradaic efficiency for the desired CO 2 reduction reaction. Various strategies to inhibit or suppress H 2 evolution for heterogeneous (3-7) and homogeneous (8,9) catalysts have been explored.To understand the factors that determine selectivity between CO 2 and H + reduction, we have been investigating the reactivity of metal hydrides. Selectivity for formate production is particularly challenging because metal hydride intermediates are common to both reaction pathways (Fig. 1). As a result, very few heterogeneous (10-13) or homogeneous (14-16) catalysts have been reported with high (>90%) Faradaic efficiency for formate production. Understanding the reactivity of metal hydrides is key to controlling the bifurcating reaction pathways that ultimately determine selectivity. Most selective catalysts for CO 2 reduction utilize kinetic inhibition (or a high-...
The hydricity (ΔG) of a newly synthesized nickel hydride was experimentally determined in acetonitrile (50.6 kcal mol), dimethyl sulfoxide (47.1 kcal mol), and water (22.8 kcal mol). The hydricity values indicate hydride transfer from [HNi(TMEPE)][BF] (TMEPE = 1,2-bis[di(methoxyethyl)phosphino]ethane) to CO is exergonic in water and endergonic in the organic solvents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.