Patient: Female, 54Final Diagnosis: Primary colonic angiosarcomaSymptoms: Rectal bleedingMedication: Levamlodipine BesylateClinical Procedure: HemicolectomySpecialty: Gastroenterology and HepatologyObjective:Rare co-existance of disease or pathologyBackground:Angiosarcoma is a rare malignant mesenchymal tumor of vascular endothelial cell origin. Its occurrence in the colorectal region is extremely rare. Only 32 cases of primary colorectal angiosarcoma are reported in the current literature. Angiosarcoma in association with calcium channel blocker has been rarely reported. We present such a case of a patient who had been on levamlodipine besylate, a calcium channel blocker, for over 10 years.Case Report:A 53-year-old female with hypertension presented with a fever, a dry cough, and hematochezia. Computed tomography (CT) scan and angiography demonstrated a 6-cm vascular mass in the ileocecal region. The clinical symptoms stopped soon after a right hemicolectomy. The histopathology with immunohistochemical studies confirmed the diagnosis of angiosarcoma. Three months after surgery, the patient had evidence of recurrence of the tumor, however, she no longer presented with a fever or a dry cough. The patient was receiving chemotherapy at the time of the report.Conclusions:Colorectal angiosarcoma is a rare malignancy of endothelial origin with uncertain etiology and often has a poor prognosis. Angiosarcoma seen in a patient taking calcium channel blocker is rare but alarming. CT scan and angiography are helpful tools to raise the suspicion of the diagnosis. A definitive pathological diagnosis relies on histopathology with immunohistochemical stains of endothelial markers. Surgical resection is still the best choice of the different treatment options.
Objective. To compare the merits and demerits of PEG-IFNα-2a and PEG-IFNα-2b for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods. Clinical files from eighty-four CHB patients admitted to the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and assigned to two groups: group 2a treated with PEG-IFNα-2a and group 2b treated with PEG-IFNα-2b. The clinical efficacy was compared between the above two arms, and the liver function (ALT, AST, HA, LN, and IV-C), HBV-DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, and inflammatory factors (IFs, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) were tested at 12 weeks (T1), 24 weeks (T2), and 48 weeks (T3). The alterations of hemodynamics (SBP, DBP, MAP, and CVP), cardiac function (LVEF and BNP), and the incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) during treatment were recorded. Finally, the patients were followed up for 2 years to investigate the quality of life (QOL) as well as the positive seroconversion rate of HBsAg and HBeAg. Results. The overall response rate was similar in the two arms ( P > 0.05 ). After treatment, the liver function, HBV-DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, IFs, hemodynamics, and cardiac function were enormously improved ( P < 0.05 ), with faster improvement in group 2b compared with group 2a ( P < 0.05 ). The investigation of ARs identified notably lower incidence rates of alopecia, thrombocytopenia, and granulocytopenia in group 2a as compared to group 2b ( P < 0.05 ). The prognostic follow-up results revealed no distinct difference in the QOL score and the positive seroconversion rate of HBsAg and HBeAg ( P > 0.05 ); however, the quantitative results of HBV-DNA, HBsAg, and HBeAg in group 2b were lower than those in group 2a ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusions. Both PEG-IFNα-2a and PEG-IFNα-2b have excellent and stable therapeutic effects on HBeAg-positive CHB, among which PEG-IFNα-2b renders a faster treatment process but higher side effects, which can provide valuable references when choosing a treatment plan for CHB.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.