Visual Abstract

The long-acting GLP-1 derivative NN2211 ameliorates glycemia and increases ␤-cell mass in diabetic mice.

The action of repaglinide, a novel insulin secretagogue, was compared with the sulfonylurea glibenclamide with regard to the hypoglycemic action in vivo, binding to betaTC-3 cells, insulin secretion from perifused mouse islets, and capacity to stimulate exocytosis by direct interaction with the secretory machinery in single voltage-clamped mouse beta-cells. Two binding sites were identified: a high-affinity repaglinide (KD = 3.6 nmol/l) site having lower affinity for glibenclamide (14.4 nmol/l) and one high-affinity glibenclamide (25 nmol/l) site having lower affinity for repaglinide (550 nmol/l). In contrast to glibenclamide, repaglinide (in concentrations as high as 5 micromol/l) lacked the ability to enhance exocytosis in voltage-clamped beta-cells. Repaglinide was more potent than glibenclamide in stimulating insulin release from perifused mouse islets (EC50 29 vs. 80 nmol/l). The greater potency of repaglinide in vitro was paralleled by similar actions in vivo. The ED50 values for the hypoglycemic action were determined to be 10.4 and 15.6 microg/kg after intravenous and oral administration, respectively. The corresponding values for glibenclamide were 70.3 microg/kg (intravenous) and 203.2 microg/kg (oral). Further, repaglinide (1 mg/kg p.o.) was effective (P < 0.001) as an insulin-releasing agent in a rat model (low-dose streptozotocin) of type 2 diabetes. These observations suggest that the insulinotropic actions of repaglinide and glibenclamide in vitro and in vivo are secondary to their binding to the high-affinity repaglinide site and that the insulinotropic action of repaglinide involves both distinct and common cellular mechanisms.

Metabolic effects of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide and the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor vildagliptin were compared in rats made obese by supplementary candy feeding. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to 12-week diets of chow or chow plus candy. The latter were randomized for 12 further weeks to continue their diet while receiving 0.2 mg/kg liraglutide twice daily subcutaneously, 10 mg/kg vildagliptin twice daily orally, or vehicle or to revert to chow-only diet. Energy expenditure was measured, and oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were performed. Body composition was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning, and pancreatic ␤-cell mass was determined by histology. Candy feeding increased weight, fat mass, and feedingassociated energy expenditure. Liraglutide or reversal to chow diet fully reversed weight and fat gains. Liraglutide was associated with decreased calorie intake and shifted food preference (increased chow/decreased candy consumption). Despite weight loss, liraglutide-treated rats did not decrease energy expenditure compared with candy-fed controls. Vildagliptin affected neither weight, food intake, nor energy expenditure. OGTTs, histology, and blood analyses indirectly suggested that both drugs increased insulin sensitivity. Liraglutide and vildagliptin inhibited obesityassociated increases in ␤-cell mass. This was associated with weight and fat mass normalization with liraglutide, but not vildagliptin, where the ratio of ␤-cell to body mass was low. Diabetes 56:8 -15, 2007