Background: Management of compound fractures is a real challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. Thorough wound irrigation and debridement is necessary to get a good outcome. Power-pulsed lavage (PPL) is a method of wound irrigation that has been popularised as an adjuvant in wound debridement. Methods: 39 patients of 28 to 40 years with Gustilo Anderson Type II and Type III fractures were divided in to two groups randomly and given pulsatile lavage or continuous flow lavage. Both the groups were followed up from January 2014 to January 2016, microbiology of the swab collected, pre and post lavage, and various other factors influencing the outcome were studied. Results: Most of the successful outcome was in the age group of 25-29 years (46.7%) and in the male gender 66.7%. The success outcome rate was 73.3% in those with Type II Gustilo Anderson fracture compared to Type III (26.7%). All persons with successful outcome had Tscherne grade II fracture. Also a clean or clean contaminated wound (CDC classification) had more chance for successful outcome (86.7%) than contaminated or dirty wounds. Conclusions: Heavy growth in pre-lavage blood agar culture was the single most important factor that determines the persistence of infection in compound fracture of both bones of leg. Type of lavage did not affect the union of fracture because presence of radiological signs of union was comparable in pulsatile group (66.7%) and continuous flow group (61.9%).
INTRODUCTIONFractures of the distal femur are complex injuries that can be difficult to manage. They are serious injuries having the potential to produce significant long-term disabilities. Distal femoral fractures are much less common than hip fractures and account for about 7% of all femoral fractures. If fractures of the hip are excluded, 31% of femoral fractures involve the distal portion.1 These fractures are defined as those fractures involving the distal 15 cm of the femur including the metaphysis and/or the articular surface. Because of severe soft tissue damage, extensive comminution, intrarticular extension and injury to quadriceps mechanism, the management of these fractures has presented significant challenge to orthopaedic surgeons since the beginning of this speciality. However, for proximal fractures of femur, orthopaedic literature is embellished with extensive experience with specific methods. The distal femur is not well suited for internal fixation. A widening canal, thin cortex and poor bone stock make open reduction in this area a great challenge. Watson Jones noted that "Few injuries present more difficult problems than supracondylar fracture of the femur". Studies done in the 1960s documented better outcomes for patients treated non-operatively than for those treated ABSTRACT Background: Management of supracondylar fractures is a real challenge to the orthopaedician due to its extensive soft tissue injury, boneloss, comminution, articular extention and instability. Open reduction and internal fixation with anatomical distal femoral locking plate permits early mobilization. Stable anatomical fixation is necessary to avoid complications and disability. Methods: 25 patients with Type A and Type C closed supracondylar femoral fractures were followed up from November 2013 to November 2015. All the patients underwent ORIF with DF-LCP. Clinical and radiological follow up were recorded for 24 months. Results: Mean time for fracture union was 4.02 months. Average duration for full weight bearing was 122 days (range 90-180days). The average range of movement for Type A fractures was 105.71 degrees, for C fractures average ROM was 93.64 degrees. Average ROM for patients <50 was 103 degree and for patients>50 ROM was 98.66 degree. Conclusions: Locked plating of DF fractures permits stable fixation and early mobilization which avoids disability and ensures good joint function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.